Decarbonylation of the experimentally
known CpRu(CO)2(η1-C5H5), CpMo(CO)2(η3-C7H7), and CpNb(CO)2(η4-C8H8) (Cp = η5-C5H5), each with uncomplexed 1,3-butadiene
units in the C
n
H
n
ring, as well as the related CpTc(CO)2(η2-C6H6), to give the corresponding carbonyl-free
derivatives CpM(η
n
-C
n
H
n
) derivatives has been
studied by density functional theory. For ruthenium, technetium, and
molybdenum the coordinated C
n
H
n
ring of the intermediate monocarbonyl CpM(CO)(η
n–2-C
n
H
n
) contains an uncomplexed CC double
bond and each decarbonylation step proceeds with a significant energy
barrier represented by a higher energy transition state. However,
decarbonylation of CpNb(CO)2(η4-C8H8) to the monocarbonyl proceeds without an energy
barrier, preserving the tetrahapto coordination of the C8H8 ring to give CpNb(CO)(η4-C8H8) in which the niobium atom has only a 16-electron configuration.
All of the monocarbonyl derivatives CpM(CO)(C
n
H
n
) are predicted to be strongly
energetically disfavored with respect to disproportionation to give
CpM(CO)2(C
n
H
n
) + CpM(C
n
H
n
). This allows us to understand the failure to date to synthesize
any of the monocarbonyl derivatives.