2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2022.120997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and reactivity of rare-earth-N,N’-(diphenyl)formamidinate and rare-earth-N,N’-bis(2,4-dimethylphenyl)formamidinate complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the Lu complex 2e lost water from the single crystal composition under the drying conditions and both coordinated and lattice water was lost. Four complexes had low % C, a frequent problem with rare earth metal-organic compounds, [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] but additional % Ln analyses and TGA data leave little doubt as to the bulk composition.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the Lu complex 2e lost water from the single crystal composition under the drying conditions and both coordinated and lattice water was lost. Four complexes had low % C, a frequent problem with rare earth metal-organic compounds, [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] but additional % Ln analyses and TGA data leave little doubt as to the bulk composition.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small resonance at δ =4.72 ppm was detected (Figure S3), which is attributable to H 2 [13] . The identity of 3 was established by X‐ray crystallography (below), but the bulk product was somewhat impure as evident from a low carbon analysis, though this is not uncommon for lanthanoid complexes owing to ease of metal carbide formation during combustion [14] . In the 1 H NMR spectrum, satisfactory integrations could not be obtained, as the effects of paramagnetism were more evident than in the case of 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] The identity of 3 was established by X-ray crystallography (below), but the bulk product was somewhat impure as evident from a low carbon analysis, though this is not uncommon for lanthanoid complexes owing to ease of metal carbide formation during combustion. [14] In the 1 H NMR spectrum, satisfactory integrations could not be obtained, as the effects of paramagnetism were more evident than in the case of 1. Thus, the backbone NCHN resonance was further shifted to 12.85 ppm (Figure S4), the aromatic hydrogens of Hbtz at 7.7-8.3 ppm were shifted to an AB doublet at 6.66-6.64 ppm, the CH and CH 3 resonances of DippForm were considerably broadened, as was the shifted thf resonance.…”
Section: Reactions Of [Sm(dippform) 2 (Thf) 2 ] With Trans-azobenzenementioning
confidence: 97%
“…A comparison of the C–N bond lengths also confirms the reduced nature of the formamidinate fragment because C10–N7 falls between the typical values for C–N single and double bonds [C10–N7 1.326(14) Å ( 3-Dy ) and 1.315(5) Å ( 3-Yb ) vs single (∼1.47 Å) and double (∼1.15 Å) C–N bonds], consistent with delocalization of the N–C–N fragment in 3-Ln . The Ln–N­(κ 3 -Tp) bond distances in 3-Ln are consistent with those of 1-Ln , 2-Ln , and [Ln­(Tp) 2 (X)] in the literature. , The Ln–N7 bond distances in 3-Ln [Ln = Dy, 2.376(8) Å; Yb, 2.373(3) Å] are consistent with the Ln–N bond distances in related literature complexes. ,, …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5b , 6 The Ln–N7 bond distances in 3-Ln [Ln = Dy, 2.376(8) Å; Yb, 2.373(3) Å] are consistent with the Ln–N bond distances in related literature complexes. 15 , 16 , 18 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%