2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and spectroscopic study of three new oxadiazole derivatives with detailed computational evaluation of their reactivity and pharmaceutical potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DFT method was employed using B3LYP functional and cc-pVDZ (5D, 7F) basis set. Results from frequency calculations after scaling were used to get the IR spectral data, which is compared with the experimental spectral vibrations [9]. By using the TD-DFT method the electronic properties of the molecules (Fig.…”
Section: Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DFT method was employed using B3LYP functional and cc-pVDZ (5D, 7F) basis set. Results from frequency calculations after scaling were used to get the IR spectral data, which is compared with the experimental spectral vibrations [9]. By using the TD-DFT method the electronic properties of the molecules (Fig.…”
Section: Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polarizability and hyperpolarizability data that were obtained during the simulation of Raman spectra were utilized for the estimation. The simulation was conducted at the same theoretical level as that of the optimization and compared with those of the standard NLO-active substance, urea [ [55] , [56] , [57] ]. The parameters of the NLO properties of ripretinib are shown in Table 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The υC = O [48] is usually found at 1750-1650 cm −1 and these are assigned at 1685, 1666 cm −1 (IR), 1675 cm −1 (Raman), 1671, 1669 cm −1 (DFT) for BZL, 1720, 1660 cm −1 (IR), 1660 cm −1 (Raman), 1667, 1665 cm −1 (DFT) for DMB, 1670, 1655 cm −1 (IR), 1672, 1658 cm −1 (Raman), 1668, 1666 cm −1 (DFT) for DFB, 1665 cm −1 (IR), 1670, 1667 cm −1 (DFT) for DCB and at 1670, 1650 cm −1 (IR), 1669, 1666 cm −1 (DFT) for DBB. For the title compounds, the ring breathing modes for para-substituted phenyl ring are assigned at 808 cm −1 (IR), 810, 788 cm −1 (Raman), 812, 787 cm −1 (DFT) for DMB, 805 cm −1 (IR), 808 cm −1 (Raman), 810, 806 cm −1 (DFT) for DFB, 835, 766 cm −1 (IR), 832, 769 cm −1 (DFT) for DCB and at 833, 763 cm −1 (IR), 829, 764 cm −1 (DFT) for DBB [49, 50]. The ring breathing mode of the mono substituted phenyl ring is assigned at 1013, 1006 cm −1 (IR), 1000 cm −1 (Raman) and at 1009, 1003 cm −1 (DFT) for BZL [51, 52, 53].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%