2018
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201712167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and Stereochemical Revision of the C31–C67 Fragment of Amphidinol 3

Abstract: Amphidinol 3( AM3) is am arine natural product produced by the dinoflagellate Amphidinium klebsii. Although the absolute configuration of AM3 was determined in 1999 by extensive NMR analysis and degradation of the natural product, it was adaunting task because of the presence of numerous stereogenic centers on the acyclic carbon chain and the limited availability from natural sources.T hereafter, revisions of the absolute configurations at C2 and C51 were reported in 2008 and 2013, respectively.Reported herein… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the central section C-30→C-49, including the two tetrahydropyran rings, was identical to the central core of AM3. Recently, Wakamiya et al [ 22 ] revised the absolute configuration of AM3 by comparing the NMR data between the natural product and the synthetic model compounds 4a and 4b . To establish the relative configuration of the common substructure in compound 1 , a comparative analysis of the NMR chemical shifts in 2:1 CD 3 OD/C 5 D 5 N ( Table S2 ) with those of 4a and 4b was carried out and the results are shown in Figure 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the central section C-30→C-49, including the two tetrahydropyran rings, was identical to the central core of AM3. Recently, Wakamiya et al [ 22 ] revised the absolute configuration of AM3 by comparing the NMR data between the natural product and the synthetic model compounds 4a and 4b . To establish the relative configuration of the common substructure in compound 1 , a comparative analysis of the NMR chemical shifts in 2:1 CD 3 OD/C 5 D 5 N ( Table S2 ) with those of 4a and 4b was carried out and the results are shown in Figure 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two examples of synthetic studies of karlotoxin 2 (KmTx2) were reported by Hamann group (the C42À C63 section) [17] and Mohapatra group (the C29À C41 section). [18] We envisaged that the target compounds (1 a and 1 b) would be synthesized through the assembly of three components via alkenyllitiumaldehyde coupling of the B-ring aldehydes (2 a and 2 b) [13] and alkenyllithiums derived from the A-ring iodoolefins (3 a and 3 b), followed by Julia-Kocienski olefination with sulfone 4 [17] (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having synthesized the A-ring fragments, we moved on to the coupling reactions (Scheme 2). The iodoolefin 3 a was treated with t-BuLi to generate alkenyllithium 15 a, which was coupled with the aldehyde 2 a [13] (1.1 equivalents to 3 a) to afford secondary alcohols 16 a (52% based on 3 a) and 17 a (14%) as a mixture of diastereomers at C41 in a 3.7 : 1 ratio. [22,23] Protection of the alcohol 16 a as TBS ether (81%) and removal of the PMB group of 18 a furnished primary alcohol 19 a (85%).…”
Section: Scheme 1 Synthesis Of the A-ring Iodoolefins (3 A And 3 B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations