Synthesis and structural characterisation of the complex mer-[{Rh(CNC₈H₉)₃(SnCl₃)(µ-SnCl₂)}₂]

Cobalt, Rhodium, Iridium, and Ruthenium Carbonyl Complexes with Stanna-closo-dodecaborate:103Rh NMR,119Sn Mössbauer Spectroscopy, and Solid-State119Sn NMR

“…The rhodium–tin distances in complex 1 can be compared with Rh–Sn bond lengths in the literature ,,,,,− Furthermore the heteroborate bridging ligand in compound 1 exhibits a smaller Rh–Sn–Rh bond angle of 60.43° in comparison to the edge-bridging Ph 2 Sn ligand (average 66.95°) in the cluster [Rh 3 (CO) 6 (μ-SnPh 2 ) 3 (SnPh 3 ) 3 ] . Therefore the Rh–Rh bond lengths in this trinuclear cluster (2.91–2.95 Å) are also longer in comparison to the dimer 1 .…”

“…The coordination chemistry of tin is an attractive field of research . Many research goups have synthesized new tin ligands and studied the reactivity and structures of the transition metal tin complexes. − Stannylenes such as bis(dialkylamino)tin or dialkyltin , derivatives are prominent ligands. Novel chelating ligands with two tin donor sites were designed in recent years .…”

Different Coordination Modes of the Ph2PCsp3PPh2 Pincer Ligand in Rhodium Complexes as a Consequence of Csp3–H Metal Interaction

“…The Rh–C distance is also longer than the Rh–C bond found in complex 1 , which can be explained by the stronger trans influence of the trichlorostannate in comparison to the chloride ligand . The Rh–Sn bond length of 2.55873(6) Å lies in the range of Rh–SnCl 3 derivatives reported earlier. − Coordination of the pyridine ligand at Rh­(III) in complex 3 exhibits a typical Rh–N bond length of 2.221(5) Å, indicating trans coordination to a ligand with a strong trans influence. , The hydride ligand was placed in a calculated position and refined with a fixed geometry.…”

Synthesis of heteronuclear gold–rhodium cluster compounds and structural characterisation of [Rh(CNC8H9)3(AuPPh3)5]2+, [Rh(CNC8H9)2(AuPPh3)6(AuCl)2]+and [Rh(CO)2(AuPPh3)7]2+

“…Crystal data .for complex 2. C1,,H1 ,,Au,C~,F,N,P,Rh, M = 3730.63, monoclinic, space group P2,/n, a = 27.748 (8),…”

“…-695 (7) -130 (20) -950 (20) 70( 20) 480( 20) 3990 (20) 45 lO (20) 3600 (20) 31 lO (20) 3060 (20) 3890 (20) 3480( 20 9) 9140( 8) 8720( 10) 7662( 9) 7340( 10) 6960( 9) 8286( 9) 8410(10) 8630( 10) 7055( 9) 6830( 10) 6406( 8) 7902( 8) 8520( 10) 8390( 10) 7230( 10) 7260( 10) 6768 (8) 9140 (20) signed to Au, Rh, P and C1 during the final cycles of refinement. The relevant positional parameters are given in Table 9.…”