2008
DOI: 10.1021/om800945g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and Structure of Organoantimony(III) Compounds Containing Antimony−Selenium and −Tellurium Terminal Bonds

Abstract: General procedures: All manipulations were carried out under an argon atmosphere using standard Schlenk tube techniques. All solvents were dried by standard procedures and distilled prior to use or stored over potassium mirror. 1 H, 13 C, 77 Se and 125 Te NMR spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[26] A slight modification of the pincer-type ligand gave also access to monomeric ). [26] The compounds are monomeric in solution, as was shown by 1 (8)).…”
Section: Synthesis and Solid State Structures Of Intramolecular-stabimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[26] A slight modification of the pincer-type ligand gave also access to monomeric ). [26] The compounds are monomeric in solution, as was shown by 1 (8)).…”
Section: Synthesis and Solid State Structures Of Intramolecular-stabimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26] A slight modification of the pincer-type ligand gave also access to monomeric ). [26] The compounds are monomeric in solution, as was shown by 1 (8)). [116] Moreover, the Sb-E bonds in the monomeric compounds ArSbE (E = Se, Te) and Ar'SbE (E = S, Se) are significantly shorter than the calculated Sb-E single bond values (∑ cov (Sb, E) 2.43 Å (E = S), 2.56 Å (E = Se), 2.93 Å (E = Te)), [59] but are only slightly enlarged compared to the calculated value of a Sb=E double bond (∑ cov (Sb, E) 2.27 Å( E = S), 2.40 Å (E = Se), 2.61 Å (E = Te)).…”
Section: Synthesis and Solid State Structures Of Intramolecular-stabimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent development shows that with the avoidance of bulky ligands such as (Me 3 Si) 2 CH [14], and 2,6-Mes 2 C 6 H 3 [15], the use of aryl ligands with one or two pendant arms (e.g. 2-(Me 2 NCH 2 )C 6 H 4 [16][17][18][19], 2,6-(Me 2 NCH 2 ) 2 C 6 H 3 [20,21], and 2,6-(ROCH 2 ) 2 C 6 H 3 (R = Me, t-Bu [22]), as well as those ortho-substituted with CH 2 NMe 2 [23,24]) or analogous ligands such as RN(CH 2 C 6 H 4 ) 2 (R = Me, t-Bu, cyclohexyl, Ph [25]) and S(CH 2 C 6 H 4 ) 2 [26] is a common strategy to generate stable organoantimony compounds. In all cases, intramolecular N, O, S Sb coordinations were observed in solution and/or solid state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%