2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular docking studies of novel 2-styryl-5-nitroimidazole derivatives containing 1,4-benzodioxan moiety as FAK inhibitors with anticancer activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The −CDOCKER energy and −CDOCKER interaction energy values are showed in Table . −CDOCKER energy is the scoring function of the CDOCKER algorithm, which represents the energy of the ligand–receptor complexes . When trying to identify the most effective binder to a given target between a set of different ligands, the binding energy is thought to be the best choice .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The −CDOCKER energy and −CDOCKER interaction energy values are showed in Table . −CDOCKER energy is the scoring function of the CDOCKER algorithm, which represents the energy of the ligand–receptor complexes . When trying to identify the most effective binder to a given target between a set of different ligands, the binding energy is thought to be the best choice .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The docking models with different sphere radius might be beneficial for the distinguishing potential active oligopeptides. –CDOCKER ENERGY (kcal/mol) was the scoring function of CDOCKER algorithm, which represented the energy of the ligand–receptor complexes [35]. Fifty percent of –CDOCKER ENERGY for three crystal structures were regarded as the threshold for screening the potential ACE inhibitory oligopeptides [36,37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding site was carried out with a radius of 17.258 Å, with coordinates x : 40.498, y : 34.883, and z : 44.382. The pose of each ligand was selected based on the interaction energy (Duan et al, ). DS was used to distinguish salt bridge, conventional hydrogen bond, carbon hydrogen bond, pi‐alkyl, van de Waals, alkyl, and metal‐acceptor bond at the ACE active sites (Guo et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%