2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-3861(00)00466-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, characterization and biodegradability of the biodegradable aliphatic–aromatic random copolyesters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
85
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Incorporation of other groups such as aromatic esters has also proven to provide the materials with a wider range of properties. In contrast, non-degradable aromatic polyesters, such as PET exhibit much better physical and mechanical properties [2]. Recently, incorporation of aliphatic units into aromatic polyesters has been employed in improving the degradability of PET [3][4][5][6][7][8], poly (propylene terephthalate) (PPT) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) [8,[11][12], and poly(1,2-propanediyl phthalate) (PPP) [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporation of other groups such as aromatic esters has also proven to provide the materials with a wider range of properties. In contrast, non-degradable aromatic polyesters, such as PET exhibit much better physical and mechanical properties [2]. Recently, incorporation of aliphatic units into aromatic polyesters has been employed in improving the degradability of PET [3][4][5][6][7][8], poly (propylene terephthalate) (PPT) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) [8,[11][12], and poly(1,2-propanediyl phthalate) (PPP) [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, high molecular weight PLA is proven as a biocompatible material with mechanical properties comparable to other commodity plastics, e.g., PE, PS and PP. In contrast, aromatic polyesters such as poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) have been reported as non-degradable materials [3]. Their physical properties, however, are much better than those of their aliphatic counterparts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aliphatic ester group degrades faster than the aromatic ester group, which is because of the higher content of flexible ester and lower bonding energy. [20,21] PTT/PBAT blends thermal degradation weight loss of 80-90% occurs at the first stage and 8-13% occurs at second stage. The PTT/PBAT blends T 50 exhibits between 410°C and 425°C at various compositions.…”
Section: Thermal Stability Of Ptt/pbat Blendsmentioning
confidence: 99%