“…A comparison of the signals reveals that the title compound displayed a SHG efficiency of about 2.0×KDP over the same particle range of 150–212 μm (Figure 2 d), and it is type I phase‐matchable, according to the rule proposed by Kurtz and Perry [51] . The value is comparable to those of sulfates, such as NH 4 NaLi 2 (SO 4 ) 2 (1.1×KDP), (NH 4 ) 2 Na 3 Li 9 (SO 4 ) 7 (0.5×KDP), [36] and Li 8 NaRb 3 (SO 4 ) 6 ⋅ 2 H 2 O (0.5×KDP), [35] as well as antimony sulfates, such as CsSbF 2 SO 4 (3.0×KDP), [42] (NH 4 )SbCl 2 (SO 4 ) (1.7×KDP), [56] RbSbSO 4 Cl 2 (2.7×KDP), [45] and Rb 2 SO 4 ⋅ SbF 3 (0.3×KDP), [47] Therefore, compound 1 is promising as a good UV NLO material, owing to the high stability, large SHG response, and phase matchability.…”