2018
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201800742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, Crystal Structures and Magnetic Properties of Two Heterobridged µ‐Phenoxo‐µ1,1‐Azide/Isocyanate Dinickel(II) Compounds: Experimental and Theoretical Exploration

Abstract: This investigation deals with the syntheses, crystal structures and experimental and density functional theoretical magnetic properties of two heterobridged and isomorphous μphenoxo-μ 1,1 -azide/isocyanate dinickel(II) compounds of com- (1) and [Ni II 2 (L) 2 (μ 1,1 -NCO)(CH 3 CN)(CH 3 OH)](ClO 4 )·CH 3 CN (2), where HL is the 1:1 condensation product of 3-ethoxysalicylaldehyde and 4-(2-aminoethyl)-morpholine. The two compounds are isostructural as well, except that 1 contains end-on azide and 2 contains end-o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far the values of the intramolecular magnetic interactions in 2–5 are concerned, the lack of previous magneto‐structural studies on these type of heterobridged motifs with high‐spin cobalt(II) ions precludes any comparison. Anyway, the antiferromagnetic coupling found for 2 ( J = –4.19 cm –1 ) is in line with that obtained for the related isostructural trinickel(II) derivative ( J = – 24.8 cm –1 for 1 ) and the ferromagnetic interactions observed for 4 ( J = +10.9 cm –1 ) and 5 ( J = +0.07 cm –1 ) are also what one could expect having in mind the ferromagnetic couplings reported for the related µ ‐phenoxido‐µ 1,1 ‐pseudohalide dinickel(II) complexes …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As far the values of the intramolecular magnetic interactions in 2–5 are concerned, the lack of previous magneto‐structural studies on these type of heterobridged motifs with high‐spin cobalt(II) ions precludes any comparison. Anyway, the antiferromagnetic coupling found for 2 ( J = –4.19 cm –1 ) is in line with that obtained for the related isostructural trinickel(II) derivative ( J = – 24.8 cm –1 for 1 ) and the ferromagnetic interactions observed for 4 ( J = +10.9 cm –1 ) and 5 ( J = +0.07 cm –1 ) are also what one could expect having in mind the ferromagnetic couplings reported for the related µ ‐phenoxido‐µ 1,1 ‐pseudohalide dinickel(II) complexes …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Anyway, the antiferromagnetic coupling found for 2 (J = -4.19 cm -1 ) is in line with that obtained for the related isostructural trinickel(II) derivative (J = -24.8 cm -1 for 1) and the ferromagnetic interactions observed for 4 (J = +10.9 cm -1 ) and 5 (J = +0.07 cm -1 ) are also what one could expect having in mind the ferromagnetic couplings reported for the related μ-phenoxido-μ 1,1 -pseudohalide dinickel(II) complexes. [14] Alternatively, the magnetic data of 2-5 can be described by the phenomenological approach based on the zfs of a S = 3/2 through the spin Hamiltonian of Equation ( 3):…”
Section: Spectral and Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that these D values are reliable because changing the magnitude or sign of D results in poor fitting of the susceptibility/magnetization data. However, the D values obtained here lie in the range of the reported examples and there are examples of higher D values of Ni II , . It may be mentioned that there is already a report in which different D values of some Ni II compounds were listed …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…As well known, the magnetic interaction can also be affected by other structural parameters besides the M–O–M angles (γ), such as the dihedral angle (δ) between the MOM plane and the phenyl plane, which also plays a key role in the bis­(phenoxo)-bridged M 2 O 2 systems (see Scheme ). ,,, The effect of dihedral angle on magnetic interaction for the Co 2 O 2 system can be explained with the help of magnetic orbitals (Scheme ). The main F contributions are almost not affected by opening the dihedral angle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%