2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.2c00384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, Electrochemical, and Computational Studies of Organocerium(III) Complexes with Ce–Aryl Sigma Bonds

Abstract: A set of organolanthanide(III) complexes featuring Ce(III)−C aryl σ-bonds have been synthesized and characterized. The syntheses follow salt metathesis reactions of the salts: ortholithiated oxazoline (Li-ortho-oxa) (L1) and Li 2 -biphenyl (L2) with t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g m e t a l l o c e n e p r e c u r s o r s : 1 -L n ([(C 5 Me 5 ) 2 LnKCl 2 (THF)] n ) Ln = La and Ce, 2-La, ( [ ( C 5 M e 4 S i M e 3 ) 2 L a K C l 2 ( T H F ) ] n ) a n d 2 -C e ([((C 5 Me 4 SiMe 3 ) 2 CeKCl 2 )(Et 2 O) 0.5 ] n ). E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…52 They are also close to those of the U–C alkyl single bond in [Li(THF) 4 ][U(CH 2 t Bu) 5 ] (2.47(1)–2.51(1) Å), 63 [Li(THF) 4 ][Li(THF) 2 U(CH 3 ) 6 ] (2.500(5)–2.615(5) Å), 64 UCp*(TMTAA)(CH 2 TMTS) (TMTAA = tetramethyl-tetra-aza-annulene) (2.48(1) Å), 65 [fc(NSi t BuMe 2 ) 2 U(CH 2 Ph)(OEt 2 )][BPh 4 ] (2.482(12) Å), 47 and [η 5 -1,2,4-(Me 3 C) 3 C 5 H 2 ] 2 U(η 2 -C 4 Ph 2 ) (2.448(5)–2.475(5) Å). 66 The bond angle of C1–U1–C2 is 69.1(7)°, which is close to the C–Ln–C angles in [Li(DME) 3 ][(C 5 Me 5 ) 2 Ln(biphen)] (Ln = Ce, 69.0(7)°; Ln = La, 68.55(8)°) 60 but is smaller than the C–M–C angles in other reported metallafluorenes (74°–130°). 56–61,67,68 The bond lengths of U–N amine (average of 2.735 Å) and U–N amido (average of 2.316 Å) are longer than those observed in complex 1 (2.695 and 2.249 Å, respectively), which is probably due to the steric hindrance of the biphenyl group.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…52 They are also close to those of the U–C alkyl single bond in [Li(THF) 4 ][U(CH 2 t Bu) 5 ] (2.47(1)–2.51(1) Å), 63 [Li(THF) 4 ][Li(THF) 2 U(CH 3 ) 6 ] (2.500(5)–2.615(5) Å), 64 UCp*(TMTAA)(CH 2 TMTS) (TMTAA = tetramethyl-tetra-aza-annulene) (2.48(1) Å), 65 [fc(NSi t BuMe 2 ) 2 U(CH 2 Ph)(OEt 2 )][BPh 4 ] (2.482(12) Å), 47 and [η 5 -1,2,4-(Me 3 C) 3 C 5 H 2 ] 2 U(η 2 -C 4 Ph 2 ) (2.448(5)–2.475(5) Å). 66 The bond angle of C1–U1–C2 is 69.1(7)°, which is close to the C–Ln–C angles in [Li(DME) 3 ][(C 5 Me 5 ) 2 Ln(biphen)] (Ln = Ce, 69.0(7)°; Ln = La, 68.55(8)°) 60 but is smaller than the C–M–C angles in other reported metallafluorenes (74°–130°). 56–61,67,68 The bond lengths of U–N amine (average of 2.735 Å) and U–N amido (average of 2.316 Å) are longer than those observed in complex 1 (2.695 and 2.249 Å, respectively), which is probably due to the steric hindrance of the biphenyl group.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…66 The bond angle of C1–U1–C2 is 69.1(7)°, which is close to the C–Ln–C angles in [Li(DME) 3 ][(C 5 Me 5 ) 2 Ln(biphen)] (Ln = Ce, 69.0(7)°; Ln = La, 68.55(8)°) 60 but is smaller than the C–M–C angles in other reported metallafluorenes (74°–130°). 56–61,67,68 The bond lengths of U–N amine (average of 2.735 Å) and U–N amido (average of 2.316 Å) are longer than those observed in complex 1 (2.695 and 2.249 Å, respectively), which is probably due to the steric hindrance of the biphenyl group. Complex 3 represents a new example of a heterofluorene containing an actinide element.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations