“…This time, differently from the comparison with (Kou & Yu, 2022), no further optimization of the excitations has been performed. This procedure led to an excitation amplitude per ring equal to {−18.50, −10.72, −5.98, −2.49, −0.83, −0.04, 0.00, −0.63, −1.97, −3.96, −6.73, −10.34, −14.98, −21.12, −28.52} dB, which has been rounded by using the same significant digits as in Yu and Kou (2023) before computing the far field. As far as the elements' excitation phase is concerned, we used the same values as the ones exploited in Yu and Kou (2023) so that, in the end, the unique difference between the two numerical experiments is the elements' excitation amplitude.…”