1970
DOI: 10.1039/c29700001616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of (1′RS,3′SR)- and (1′RS,3′RS)-5-ethyl-5-(3′-hydroxy-1′-methylbutyl)barbituric acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It caused damage to DNA and disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential, released cytochrome c, and led to mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis [3,28,29]. Although AgNPs Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/7/19 11:06 AM administration caused a statistically significant increase in apoptosis, all obtained results of tumors from the AgNPs group are in agreement with the results for apoptosis in spontaneous GBM, which was at the level of <3.00% [30][31][32][33]. It is well known that malignant tumor cells, such as GBM, are extremely resistant to apoptosis and particularly resistant to radiation and chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It caused damage to DNA and disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential, released cytochrome c, and led to mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis [3,28,29]. Although AgNPs Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/7/19 11:06 AM administration caused a statistically significant increase in apoptosis, all obtained results of tumors from the AgNPs group are in agreement with the results for apoptosis in spontaneous GBM, which was at the level of <3.00% [30][31][32][33]. It is well known that malignant tumor cells, such as GBM, are extremely resistant to apoptosis and particularly resistant to radiation and chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This is in contrast with the type celadonite of Wise and Eugster (1964), or the example given by Buckley et al (1978). Such amalgamation of these two reflections is more typical of glauconite (see, for example, Carroll, 1970), but could also be due to the presence of a more aluminous and/or K-deficient phase such as a 1M muscovite with the 130 reflection near to 2.58 A (Yoder and Eugster, 1955), or possibly a phengite. The lack of published powder diffraction data for phengites makes this latter point speculative, but receives support from the review of the mica group by Bailey (1980).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Substituting this expression for X in (9), we have (10) where in the second line of (10) analytes present in both samples. This does not give us any information yet on which analytes are present in both samples.…”
Section: The Sk (Sanchez and Kowalski) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%