“…After the publication of our review about the chemistry and biology of the bengamides and bengazoles in 2014 [1], a new review was published in 2017 by Crews et al [36]. In summary, until 2014, a total of 111 analogues of the bengamides were synthesized [27,[37][38][39][40][41], together with numerous total syntheses of the natural congeners [42][43][44][45][46], by different research groups, and biologically evaluated against different tumor cell lines, which, overall, represents an extensive and thorough structure-activity relationship study that has allowed for the establishment of a consistent and well-defined pharmacophore for the bengamides, summarized in the following points: (a) the importance of the substituent at the terminal olefinic position; (b) the essential role of the polyketide fragment, whose hydroxyl groups and stereochemistries are essential for their biological properties; and; (c) the beneficial impact of the modification of the caprolactam fragment in their antitumor properties. Among the analogues that displayed improved pharmacological properties in comparison with the natural counterparts, were the bengamide A analogue 25, known as LAF389, which presented a greater solubility in water with respect to bengamide A (1), or the modified caprolactam analogue 26, the cyclopentyl analogue of bengamide E 27, or the ring-opened bengamide analogue 28, which exhibited a major antitumor potency compared with bengamide E (5), being analogue 28 the most potent analogue identified so far (Figure 3).…”