2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2010.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of (3S,4R)-bengamide E

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1e,3,38,4248 Compounds with single-digit nanomolar or subnanomolar activity against MDA-MB-435 or HCT-116 tumor cell lines represent important inputs for the design of a potential clinical candidate. Alternatively, minor modifications of the polyketide OCH 3 group, changing the absolute configurations at positions C-5 to C-8, or replacing the caprolactam with unoptimized subunits can be disastrous.…”
Section: Structure–activity Relationship Cytotoxicity Activity Pattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1e,3,38,4248 Compounds with single-digit nanomolar or subnanomolar activity against MDA-MB-435 or HCT-116 tumor cell lines represent important inputs for the design of a potential clinical candidate. Alternatively, minor modifications of the polyketide OCH 3 group, changing the absolute configurations at positions C-5 to C-8, or replacing the caprolactam with unoptimized subunits can be disastrous.…”
Section: Structure–activity Relationship Cytotoxicity Activity Pattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison of Panel A plots differences in 13 C shifts of natural bengamide E ( 8 ) from J. coriacea 36 versus data published for 8 from three different enantiospecific total syntheses; 4042 and documents that the variation in shifts at each site is < 1ppm. By contrast, the information of Panel B shows that modification of the absolute configurations at C-6 and C-7 in the synthetic 8 diastereomer of 5 R , 6 R , 7 S , 8 R configuration, also obtained by an enantiospecific total synthesis, 43 imparts a >1 ppm change in the 13 C NMR chemical shifts at the 3/4 sites. Finally, Panel C illustrates the close parallelisms in shifts of the following set: (a) natural bengamide E ( 8 ), synthetic bengamide E ( 8 ), (c) natural bengamide E’( 13 ) as a diastereomeric mixture, and (d) synthetic E’ ( 13 ) reported from a scalemic total synthesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…After the publication of our review about the chemistry and biology of the bengamides and bengazoles in 2014 [1], a new review was published in 2017 by Crews et al [36]. In summary, until 2014, a total of 111 analogues of the bengamides were synthesized [27,[37][38][39][40][41], together with numerous total syntheses of the natural congeners [42][43][44][45][46], by different research groups, and biologically evaluated against different tumor cell lines, which, overall, represents an extensive and thorough structure-activity relationship study that has allowed for the establishment of a consistent and well-defined pharmacophore for the bengamides, summarized in the following points: (a) the importance of the substituent at the terminal olefinic position; (b) the essential role of the polyketide fragment, whose hydroxyl groups and stereochemistries are essential for their biological properties; and; (c) the beneficial impact of the modification of the caprolactam fragment in their antitumor properties. Among the analogues that displayed improved pharmacological properties in comparison with the natural counterparts, were the bengamide A analogue 25, known as LAF389, which presented a greater solubility in water with respect to bengamide A (1), or the modified caprolactam analogue 26, the cyclopentyl analogue of bengamide E 27, or the ring-opened bengamide analogue 28, which exhibited a major antitumor potency compared with bengamide E (5), being analogue 28 the most potent analogue identified so far (Figure 3).…”
Section: New Progress In Antitumor Properties Of the Bengamidesmentioning
confidence: 99%