2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11018-006-0133-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of a simulation model for an electromagnetic flowmeter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these, POTOK ͑devel-oped by Velt and Mikhailova͒, which uses a magnetic field converter ͑MFC͒ in the form of an induction coil constructed in accordance with the surface weighting function, enables one to simulate instruments of different construction and for different hydrodynamic regimes and flow structures. 10,11 The device is applicable for dry calibrating EMFs with channel diameters from small values ͑order of several millimeters͒ to indefinitely large values ͑up to 2000 mm or more͒. 11 However, POTOK requires additional comparison tests ͑between dry calibration and flow-rig calibration͒ to obtain a correct factor for each MFC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among these, POTOK ͑devel-oped by Velt and Mikhailova͒, which uses a magnetic field converter ͑MFC͒ in the form of an induction coil constructed in accordance with the surface weighting function, enables one to simulate instruments of different construction and for different hydrodynamic regimes and flow structures. 10,11 The device is applicable for dry calibrating EMFs with channel diameters from small values ͑order of several millimeters͒ to indefinitely large values ͑up to 2000 mm or more͒. 11 However, POTOK requires additional comparison tests ͑between dry calibration and flow-rig calibration͒ to obtain a correct factor for each MFC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 The device is applicable for dry calibrating EMFs with channel diameters from small values ͑order of several millimeters͒ to indefinitely large values ͑up to 2000 mm or more͒. 11 However, POTOK requires additional comparison tests ͑between dry calibration and flow-rig calibration͒ to obtain a correct factor for each MFC. Typically, POTOK has a calibration error after correction of about 0.5% as compared against experimental data on a flow-rig setup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%