1978
DOI: 10.1039/c39780000260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of cluster compounds via nucleophilic metal complexes; X-ray crystal structures of [Os3Pt(µ-H)2(CO)10{(C6H11)3P}] and [Os2Pt2(µ-H)2(CO)8(Ph3P)2]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…)-C(l1)-O(I1) 168.0(10) Ru(3)-C(33)-0(33) 171.2(14) though a detailed study has been carried out2 1 on [Ru3(p-H),-(p3-CMe)(C0)9] which differs only in the ligand on the triplybridging carbyne species. Surprisingly, in the light of the results for (2), comparison of (3) with [Ru3(p-H),(p-CMe)-(CO),] reveals differences which are only marginally significant except, of course, for the reduction of symmetry consequent upon replacement of one bridging hydrido-ligand by AuPPh,.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…)-C(l1)-O(I1) 168.0(10) Ru(3)-C(33)-0(33) 171.2(14) though a detailed study has been carried out2 1 on [Ru3(p-H),-(p3-CMe)(C0)9] which differs only in the ligand on the triplybridging carbyne species. Surprisingly, in the light of the results for (2), comparison of (3) with [Ru3(p-H),(p-CMe)-(CO),] reveals differences which are only marginally significant except, of course, for the reduction of symmetry consequent upon replacement of one bridging hydrido-ligand by AuPPh,.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall configuration is comparable with that of [AuRu,(p-COMe) (CO),o(PPh3)]11 in that the 'butterfly' configuration of the Ru( l)-Ru(3) 2.879(2), Ru(l)-Ru(2) 2.875(2), Ru(3)-Ru(2) 2.865(2), Au-P 2.308(3), Ru(l)-C(4) 2.11 5( 13), Ru(2)-C(4) 2.065(1 I), Phenyl rings omitted for clarity. Dimensions : Ru(1)-Ru(2) 2.979 (6), Ru( l)-Ru(4) 3.001(5), R u ( ~) -R u ( ~) 2.962 (8), Ru(3)-Ru(4) 2.803(5), Ru(l)-Ru(3) 2.81 5 (6), Ru(2)-Ru(3) 2.802(8), Au( 1)-Ru(1) 2.838(5), Au(2)-Ru(l) 2.844 (7), Au(3)-Ru(l) 2.839(5), Au(2)-Ru(2) 2.843(4), Au(3)-Ru(2) 3.012(4), Au(1)-Ru(4) 2.825(4), Au(3)-Ru(4) 2.956 (6), Au(l)-Au(3) 2.81 9(4), A u ( ~) -A u ( ~) 2.842(3), Au(1) -P(1) 2.27(2), A u ( ~) -P ( ~) 2.30(2), Au(3)-P(3) 2.30 (1). metal atom core is sitnilar, with the gold atom occupying one of the wing-tips.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular structure of [Au,Ru,( p-H)(CO),,(PPh,),] (4).Phenyl rings omitted for clarity. Dimensions : Ru(1)-Ru(2) 2.979(6), Ru( l)-Ru(4) 3.001(5), R u ( ~) -R u ( ~) 2.962(8), Ru(3)-Ru(4) 2.803(5), Ru(l)-Ru(3) 2.81 5(6), Ru(2)-Ru(3) 2.802(8), Au( 1)-Ru(1) 2.838(5), Au(2)-Ru(l) 2.844(7), Au(3)-Ru(l) 2.839(5), Au(2)-Ru(2) 2.843(4), Au(3)-Ru(2) 3.012(4), Au(1)-Ru(4) 2.825(4), Au(3)-Ru(4) 2.956(6), Au(l)-Au(3) 2.81 9(4), A u ( ~) -A u ( ~) 2.842(3), Au(1) -P(1) 2.27(2), A u ( ~) -P ( ~) 2.30(2), Au(3)-P(3) 2.30(1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural relationship between 5 and 6c is of particular interest. The replacement of a μ -H group in a M( μ -H)M system by the isolobal μ -Au(PPh 3 ) group was first recognized 20 years ago, and the methodology was subsequently developed to prepare many heteronuclear metal clusters with μ -Au(PR 3 ) groups . Hence, treatment of 4b with [Au(PPh 3 )] + might have been anticipated to yield a molecule wherein the gold fragment bridges a Ru−Ru bond as does the bridging hydrido ligand H(23) of 5 (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%