“…In the 1st cycle, the very high discharge capacity of all electrodes was likely associated with side reactions, including SEI formation, which is typical of CNFs. , In subsequent cycles and at relatively low current density (40–2000 mA/g), the electrodes had almost identical discharge capacities, implying little benefit of the micron-scale pores since there was sufficient time for ion transport to all active sites in both electrodes. However, a difference in deliverable capacity developed on further increase in the current density (≥4000 mA/g), with the honeycomb electrode delivering ∼100 mAh/g at 8000 mA/g that was three times that of the identical electrode without the honeycomb structure, outperforming conventional graphite electrodes (anodes) at similar rates. − Thus, despite the initial high reactivity and relative low electrode density, the honeycomb structure delivered significant benefits in the high C-rate region.…”