1987
DOI: 10.1021/jo00233a027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of enantiomerically enriched homoallylic alcohols and of 1,2-dien-1-ols using chiral tin(IV) complexes containing diethyl tartrate as an auxiliary ligand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethyl 4‐hydroxy‐2‐methylene‐4‐phenylbutanoate (9 c) :59 Compound 9 c was obtained from benzaldehyde (0.5 mmol) and polymer 1 c as a colorless oil (100 mg, 91 %) after purification by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate 88:12, R f = 0.10); 1 H NMR: δ = 1.32 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 2.66 (dd, J = 14.1, 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.78 (dd, J = 14.1, 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.92 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.20 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 4.87 (ddd, J = 8.4, 4.2, 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.58 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 6.22 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.23–7.37 (m, 5 H) ppm; 13 C NMR: δ = 14.2, 42.6, 61.1, 73.2, 125.7 (2×C), 127.5, 128.2, 128.4 (2×C), 137.2, 144.0, 167.8 ppm; IR (KBr): $\tilde \nu $ = 3460, 3074, 3030, 2981, 2960, 2929, 2872, 1715, 1630, 1500, 1455, 1193, 756, 700 cm −1 ; MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (relative intensity): 220 (2), 175 (5), 174 (18), 157 (7), 129 (15), 114 (88), 107 (100), 105 (18), 86 (73), 79 (71), 77 (46), 69 (21), 68 (48), 40 (20), 29 (14).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethyl 4‐hydroxy‐2‐methylene‐4‐phenylbutanoate (9 c) :59 Compound 9 c was obtained from benzaldehyde (0.5 mmol) and polymer 1 c as a colorless oil (100 mg, 91 %) after purification by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate 88:12, R f = 0.10); 1 H NMR: δ = 1.32 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 2.66 (dd, J = 14.1, 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.78 (dd, J = 14.1, 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.92 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.20 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 4.87 (ddd, J = 8.4, 4.2, 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.58 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 6.22 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.23–7.37 (m, 5 H) ppm; 13 C NMR: δ = 14.2, 42.6, 61.1, 73.2, 125.7 (2×C), 127.5, 128.2, 128.4 (2×C), 137.2, 144.0, 167.8 ppm; IR (KBr): $\tilde \nu $ = 3460, 3074, 3030, 2981, 2960, 2929, 2872, 1715, 1630, 1500, 1455, 1193, 756, 700 cm −1 ; MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (relative intensity): 220 (2), 175 (5), 174 (18), 157 (7), 129 (15), 114 (88), 107 (100), 105 (18), 86 (73), 79 (71), 77 (46), 69 (21), 68 (48), 40 (20), 29 (14).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the transfer hydrogenative protocol enables asymmetric carbonyl prenylation from the alcohol or aldehyde oxidation level, as demonstrated by the formation of identical sets of optically enriched adducts. This process constitutes an alternative to the use of stoichiometric metallic reagents in enantioselective carbonyl reverse prenylation [8][9][10][11][12] and represents the first use of allenes in enantioselective C-C bond forming transfer hydrogenation.…”
Section: Nih Public Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the transfer hydrogenative protocol enables asymmetric carbonyl prenylation from the alcohol or aldehyde oxidation level, as demonstrated by the formation of identical sets of optically enriched adducts. This process constitutes an alternative to the use of stoichiometric metallic reagents in enantioselective carbonyl reverse prenylation [8][9][10][11][12] and represents the first use of allenes in enantioselective C-C bond forming transfer hydrogenation.Initial studies focused on the coupling of 1,1-dimethylallene 1a to aldehyde 2a. After extensive study, which involved a nearly exhaustive assay of commercial chelating chiral phosphine ligands, optical results (4a, 94% yield, 89% ee, Table 1) were achieved upon exposure of a toluene solution of 1a and 2a to the cyclometallated iridium C,O-benzoate derived from allyl acetate, m-nitrobenzoic acid and (S)-SEGPHOS 13 (eqn.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are variety of methods for the construction of hydroxyallenes that include prototropic rearrangement of propargylic alcohols [14,15,16], metal-catalyzed nucleophilic addition of propargylic derivatives to aldehydes [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24], Cu(I)-catalyzed reaction of propargylic chlorides with Grignard reagents [25,26,27], metal-catalyzed reaction of propargylic oxiranes with organometallic compounds [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35] and ketones [36,37], reduction of alcohols, ethers, oxiranes etc. with aluminium reagents [38,39,40], Pd(0)-catalyzed reaction of cyclic carbonates with acetylenic compounds [41,42], S N 2’ [43,44] and A N [45,46,47] reactions of metalled alkoxy-allenes with oxiranes and ketones [5], and other routes [48,49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%