2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of g-C3N4/Fe3O4/MoS2 composites for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristic diffraction peaks of Fe 3 O 4 and MoS 2 are discernible in the F-M-X, implying that the composite catalyst retains both Fe 3 O 4 and MoS 2 crystalline phases . However, the typical diffraction peak of MoS 2 at 39.26° in F-M-X composites is incomplete, possibly attributed to the partial low crystallinity of MoS 2 during the hydrothermal process, as reported before. , The Raman spectra of the F-M-3 and MoS 2 confirmed the presence of the intralayer (E 1 2g , 375.6 cm –1 ) and interlayer symmetric (A 1g , 405.7 cm –1 ) modes of the MoS 2 nanohybrid, as shown in Figure g. , As reported, the coexistence of the two infrared characteristic peaks in the F-M-3 suggested an intermolecular interaction between the two components through a possible formation of Fe–S bonds . Such interaction can intrinsically change the stress in the MoS 2 lattice and eventually vary the vibrational frequency of the lattice, as reflected by the Raman results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The characteristic diffraction peaks of Fe 3 O 4 and MoS 2 are discernible in the F-M-X, implying that the composite catalyst retains both Fe 3 O 4 and MoS 2 crystalline phases . However, the typical diffraction peak of MoS 2 at 39.26° in F-M-X composites is incomplete, possibly attributed to the partial low crystallinity of MoS 2 during the hydrothermal process, as reported before. , The Raman spectra of the F-M-3 and MoS 2 confirmed the presence of the intralayer (E 1 2g , 375.6 cm –1 ) and interlayer symmetric (A 1g , 405.7 cm –1 ) modes of the MoS 2 nanohybrid, as shown in Figure g. , As reported, the coexistence of the two infrared characteristic peaks in the F-M-3 suggested an intermolecular interaction between the two components through a possible formation of Fe–S bonds . Such interaction can intrinsically change the stress in the MoS 2 lattice and eventually vary the vibrational frequency of the lattice, as reflected by the Raman results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…29,30 The Raman spectra of the F-M-3 and MoS 2 confirmed the presence of the intralayer (E 1 2g , 375.6 cm −1 ) and interlayer symmetric (A 1g , 405.7 cm −1 ) modes of the MoS 2 nanohybrid, as shown in Figure 1g. 31,32 As reported, the coexistence of the two infrared characteristic peaks in the F-M-3 suggested an intermolecular interaction between the two components through a possible formation of Fe−S bonds. 33 Such interaction can intrinsically change the stress in the MoS 2 lattice and eventually vary the vibrational frequency of the lattice, 34 as reflected by the Raman results.…”
Section: Characterization Ofmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The diffraction peak located near 13.0 • corresponds to the (100) plane of g-C 3 N 4 , while the peak observed around 27.4 • is attributed to the (002) plane of g-C 3 N 4 . These peak positions are in good agreement with the characteristic XRD patterns of g-C 3 N 4 (JCPDS 87-1526) [49]. For the Bi As depicted in Figure 2a, the g-C3N4 synthesized using the thermal oxidation exfoliation method with urea as a precursor resulted in a profusion of irregularly stacked lamellar structures.…”
Section: Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…At present, the evaluation of ECSA was based on its proportional relationship with the electric double-layer capacitance ( C dl ), so the magnitude of ECSA could be reflected by measuring C dl . Figure S7a–c shows the CV curves of the three catalysts at different scan speeds. , Figure e shows that the C dl (linear slope) of Fe 3 C-FeSA@3DCN is 11.2 mF cm –2 , and the ECSA of Fe 3 C-FeSA@3DCN was also larger than that of NC@3DCN and NC. These results indicated that Fe 3 C-FeSA@3DCN had larger catalytic active centers, and the material itself had more Fe-Nx active centers …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure S7a−c shows the CV curves of the three catalysts at different scan speeds. 47,48 Figure 4e shows that the C dl (linear slope) of Fe 3 C-FeSA@3DCN is 11.2 mF cm −2 , and the ECSA of Fe 3 C-FeSA@3DCN was also larger than that of NC@ 3DCN and NC. These results indicated that Fe 3 C-FeSA@ 3DCN had larger catalytic active centers, and the material itself had more Fe-Nx active centers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%