2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of ground and remote sensing data for monitoring ecosystem functions in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From 1993 to 1999, a series of flows during the winter and spring that varied in peak discharge rates of >500 m 3 /s in 1993 to <100 m 3 /s during 1997 and >200 m 3 /s in the next 2 years were related to increases in vegetation cover of almost 10% that occurred after 3 years of consecutive floods (Zamora‐Arroyo & Nagler et al, ). This was also supported by Nagler et al () and Nagler, Glenn, and Hinojosa‐Huerta (). In comparison, after the 2014 pulse flow, mean vegetation cover in the 21 transects increased 14% (from 33.1% to 47.2%), but the growth was not maintained after the 2015 growing season and vegetation cover returned to 2014 or lower values in most transects of the three first reaches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From 1993 to 1999, a series of flows during the winter and spring that varied in peak discharge rates of >500 m 3 /s in 1993 to <100 m 3 /s during 1997 and >200 m 3 /s in the next 2 years were related to increases in vegetation cover of almost 10% that occurred after 3 years of consecutive floods (Zamora‐Arroyo & Nagler et al, ). This was also supported by Nagler et al () and Nagler, Glenn, and Hinojosa‐Huerta (). In comparison, after the 2014 pulse flow, mean vegetation cover in the 21 transects increased 14% (from 33.1% to 47.2%), but the growth was not maintained after the 2015 growing season and vegetation cover returned to 2014 or lower values in most transects of the three first reaches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Both studies from Nagler et al (, ) highlight the link between the 1993 high flow (almost 4 times higher than the 2014 pulse flow) and recruitment of native trees in the corridor. The 2014 pulse flow, by contrast, resulted in minimal establishment of native trees (Shafroth et al, ) and a temporary increase in the number of species and vegetation cover.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The park contains more than 60 different species, size and type of landscape trees and shrubs with an additional broad coverage of Kikuyu turf grass, which is irrigated using a sprinkler system. Several research studies have successfully developed ET prediction models using VIs for different vegetation covers [19] including shrub lands [20,21], riparian sites [22][23][24][25], and over regional scales with a variety of land covers/land uses of grasslands to forests [26,27]. NDVI, the most widely used VI, quantifies the vegetation's photosynthetic response to red radiation absorption and near infrared reflectance [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the advantages of using RS techniques to measure ET, several disadvantages have also been reported (Rana and Katerji 2000, Courault et al 2005, Allen et al 2011b. These include the time period between satellite captures Wood 2006, Jiang et al 2009), the high costs associated with obtaining high resolution images particularly airborne images (Stisen et al 2008, Mutiga et al 2010, the uncertainty in estimating aerodynamic components (Min and Lin 2006), errors in spatial datasets (Chen et al 2005, Wu et al 2010 and some errors in measuring narrow vegetation areas such as riparian zones (Nagler et al 2005a(Nagler et al , 2005b(Nagler et al , 2009a(Nagler et al , 2009b. It should also be noted that temporal differences between satellite/airborne images can result not only from spectral changes but also from daily, monthly and yearly changes in solar position which directly affect vegetation density (Weng et al 2004).…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of Remote Sensing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%