“…At this time, th OD values of the GdPO4·H2O/PLGA, GdPO4•H2O@SiO2/PLGA, GdPO4‧H2O@SiO APS/PLGA and PBLG-g-GdPO4•H2O/PLGA groups were all higher than those of PLGA especially the OD values of PBLG-g-GdPO4•H2O/PLGA cultured cells, which were th highest, with significant differences (p < 0.05). This indicates that the modifiers had goo biocompatibility, which may have been the consequence of the positive biocompatibili and biological effects of GdPO4‧H2O, SiO2, APS and polyglutamic acid in PBLG [32,[41][42][43][44] At 7 days of incubation, the OD values of the groups were similar, with only th GdPO4•H2O@SiO2/PLGA and PBLG-g-GdPO4•H2O/PLGA groups having slightly high OD values than the glass, GdPO4·H2O/PLGA and GdPO4‧H2O@SiO2-APS/PLGA group but there was no significant difference (p > 0.05). In the above cell experiments, it w demonstrated that the surface modification of GdPO4·H2O resulted in low toxicity of th modifiers to MC3T3-E1 cells in the experimental concentration range and in PLGA, wi no significant inhibition of cell adhesion behavior and cell proliferation, but rather a pr cell proliferation effect at 3 days of culture (notably PBLG-g-GdPO4•H2O), indicating th the modifiers were all biocompatible.…”