2018
DOI: 10.1002/app.46984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of molecularly imprinted polymer by suspension polymerization for selective extraction of p‐hydroxybenzoic acid from water

Abstract: Molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) for selective extraction of p-hydroxybenzoic acid (p-HB) was synthesized by suspension polymerization using p-HB as template, 4-vinyl pyridine as functional monomer and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate as crosslinker. As characterized by scanning electron microscopy, the MIP particles are spherical, with size ranging from 1 to 8 μm. Compared with the non-imprinted polymer (NIP), the MIP shows higher binding capacity toward p-HB: maximum binding capacity for p-HB being 8.07 μmo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Iridoid glycosides, spiramycin, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, diclofenac, alfatoxins [17][18][19][20][21] Suspension polymerization Malachite green, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, timolol, alfatoxins B1, Pb 2+ [22][23][24][25][26] Emulsion polymerization Quercetin, malachite green, Listeria monocytogenes, triazines, Cd 2+ [27][28][29][30][31] Seed polymerization Nicotinamide, bisphenol A, promazine derivates [32][33][34] Precipitation polymerization Triclosan and triclocarban, strychnine, caffeic acid, vitamin E, prednisolone [35][36][37][38][39] RAFT polymerization Benzimidazole, propranolol, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [40][41][42] Atom transfer radical polymerization Ofloxacin, ␤2-agonists [43,44] Sol-gel Iprodione, methylxanthines [45,46] RAFT: Reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer.…”
Section: Bulk Polymerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iridoid glycosides, spiramycin, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, diclofenac, alfatoxins [17][18][19][20][21] Suspension polymerization Malachite green, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, timolol, alfatoxins B1, Pb 2+ [22][23][24][25][26] Emulsion polymerization Quercetin, malachite green, Listeria monocytogenes, triazines, Cd 2+ [27][28][29][30][31] Seed polymerization Nicotinamide, bisphenol A, promazine derivates [32][33][34] Precipitation polymerization Triclosan and triclocarban, strychnine, caffeic acid, vitamin E, prednisolone [35][36][37][38][39] RAFT polymerization Benzimidazole, propranolol, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [40][41][42] Atom transfer radical polymerization Ofloxacin, ␤2-agonists [43,44] Sol-gel Iprodione, methylxanthines [45,46] RAFT: Reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer.…”
Section: Bulk Polymerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the pore sizes of the samples ranged from 2 to 50 nm, the polymers were classified as mesoporous. The morphology of MIPs that characterized by SEM via the suspension technique was discuss detailed by Liu et al [85] to synthesis MIPs for the selective extraction of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HB). It shows that the MIP particles were spherical, with sizes ranging from 1 to 8 µm, with a peak value of 5 µm, while the MIP microspheres have an average diameter of 4.8 µm.…”
Section: Characterization Of Molecularly Imprinted Polymermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for MIP-SPE, MIP particles for dSPE can be obtained by bulk polymerization that gives a monolith that must be crushed and possibly sieved. 53,58,64,[143][144][145][146] More homogenous MIP microspheres can also be obtained by precipitation polymerization, 63,65,[147][148][149] suspension polymerization, 45,89 and emulsion polymerization. 150 Another option is surface imprinting, which mainly consists in dispersing a core sorbent in the polymerization solution as described in detail in recent reviews.…”
Section: Preparation Of the Mip Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…94 In most of the cases, 5-100 mg of particles are dispersed in the samples. The ratio between the amount of MIP particles and the volume of the sample, that has only been optimized in some cases, 68,180 can be lower than 1, 32,33,44,94,143,158,169,179 between 1 and 10, 45,50,58,59,61,64,65,89,98,106,107,111,114,117,147,154,155,[163][164][165]170,177,178,185 or up to 50 34,66,69,144,149,168,174,181,188 and even 250 mg/mL. 43 Environmental waters were filtered 172 or directly put in contact with the MIP particles for the extraction of target analytes.…”
Section: Applications Of Mip In Dspementioning
confidence: 99%