2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of monodisperse chitosan nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The zeta potential of FCN was + 34 mV, which meant that these nanoparticles could be stable for a long time. This is in agreement with the results of Sullivan et al (2018) who reported that when chitosan and TPP are mixed with each other, they spontaneously formed complexes with an overall positive surface charge. According to Yien, Zin, Sarwar, and Katas 2012, nanoparticles with a surface charge greater than + 30 mV are more stable.…”
Section: Characterization Of Fcnsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The zeta potential of FCN was + 34 mV, which meant that these nanoparticles could be stable for a long time. This is in agreement with the results of Sullivan et al (2018) who reported that when chitosan and TPP are mixed with each other, they spontaneously formed complexes with an overall positive surface charge. According to Yien, Zin, Sarwar, and Katas 2012, nanoparticles with a surface charge greater than + 30 mV are more stable.…”
Section: Characterization Of Fcnsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The molecular weight of the chitosan used was reported to affect the zeta potential as well. Low molecular weight chitosan had higher zeta potential compared to moderate molecular weight chitosan [18]. Binding and stability of CpG ODN on particles could not be shown in this study because of the negative band of 1, 2, 4 and 24 h incubation time (data not shown).…”
Section: Chitosan Was Synthesized and Characterized As Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Due the different pKa values 0.9, 1.9, 5.3, 7.7 and 9.5 ( [36,37], multiple anions (P3O10 5− , HP3O10 4− , H2P3O10 3− , H3P3O10 2− and H4P3O10 − ) may be present in solution depending on the pH when TPP is dissolved in water, which is undesirable as they can competitively react with the protonated ammonium groups (NH3 + ) of chitosan solution (pH 5.0). Therefore, the pH of TPP was adjusted to 5.0 to make sure that predominantly H2P3O10 3− (~67%) ions exist in solution; this is also beneficial in producing less polydisperse nanoparticles [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%