“…Compared to the O-donor ligands, the S-donor chromophores increase the HOMO energy, decrease the HOMO–LUMO gap, and may lead to enhanced electronic communication between the sulfur donor ligand and lanthanide center . Due to their extensive range of applications, the resulting structures form a class of compounds, which has attracted significant attention in the last decades. , The necessary stability for practical application was achieved for the heteroligand Ln complexes, consisting of dtc anion and L = phen or 2,2′ -bipy (with general formula Ln(S 2 CNR 2 ) 3 (L)). ,,− They are successfully used in photochemistry, ,,, as precursors of Ln sulfides , and demonstrate certain features, which are suitable for the development of novel electronic devices . It has been reported that the combination of phen and dtc ligands results in better sensitization for Sm 3+ and Pr 3+ ions and the corresponding complexes exhibit more intense emission than those of the Eu 3+ , Tb 3+ , and Dy 3+ analogues. ,, The observed low luminescence intensity of Eu(S 2 CNR 2 ) 3 (phen) was surprisingly relying on the Dexter mechanism and taking into account that (1) T 1 state (concentrated mainly on phen ) is a potential antenna for the excited energy transfer to Eu 3+ similar to the highly luminescent Eu 3+ - phen complexes; , (2) the resonance between the excited T 1 ( phen ) state (21,740 cm –1 , 2.69 eV) and the acceptor levels of Eu 3+ (17,277 cm –1 , 2.14 eV)/Sm 3+ (17,860 cm –1 , 2.21 eV) are suitable (Δ E ∼0.5–0.6 eV) , for both ions unlike the higher energy acceptor levels of Dy 3+ (21,056 cm –1 , 2.61 eV) , and Tb 3+ (20,500 cm –1 , 2.54 eV); , (3) the heteroligand Eu 3+ and Sm 3+ complexes studied are isostructural.…”