2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of poly(methyl methacrylate) nanoparticles via differential microemulsion polymerization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, oligoradicals could continue to form new particles via the nucleation process. Due to the fact that these two processes controlled the reaction in each step . At a low initiator concentration, the oligoradicals could grow less into particles with a small change size resulting in the particle size of 44 to 46 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, oligoradicals could continue to form new particles via the nucleation process. Due to the fact that these two processes controlled the reaction in each step . At a low initiator concentration, the oligoradicals could grow less into particles with a small change size resulting in the particle size of 44 to 46 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle size increased slightly with an increase in the initiator concentration. This phenomenon can be explained in that increasing the initiator concentration results in more nucleation in the water phase as a result of more free radicals being formed [26]. Thus, some dead polymer occurred from combination of two radicals having carbon double bonds in polymer chains probably have more chance to be initiated to new radicals that could play a role on the polymerization resulting in the larger particle size.…”
Section: Effect Of Initiator Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[441][442][443][444] To produce hydrophobic polymeric NPs, the most commonly used precursors are poly-lactic acid (PLA), 445 poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PGLA), 446 or polystyrene (PS), 447 while for hydrophilic NPs the most favored materials are PEG, 448 poly-ethyleneimine (PEI), 449 poly-lysine, 450 and sometimes poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) when appropriately modified. 451 Each of them have their respective advantages and disadvantages. For instance, hydrophobic particles are ideal to encapsulate hydrophobic drugs and fluorophores while hydrophilic NPs are more compatible with bodily fluids and can be more easily functionalized with biorecognition or targeting molecules.…”
Section: Synthetic Polymer Based Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%