2I−VI,3I−VII,6I−VII‐Eicosa‐O‐methyl‐2I‐O‐(oct‐7‐enyl)cyclomaltoheptaose, 2I−VII,3I−VI,6I−VII‐eicosa‐O‐methyl‐3I‐O‐(oct‐7‐enyl)cyclomaltoheptaose, and 2I−VII,3I−VII,6I−VI‐eicosa‐O‐methyl‐6I‐O‐(oct‐7‐enyl)cyclomaltoheptaose were synthesized by selective introduction of an oct‐7‐enyl group at one of the O‐2, O‐3, or O‐6 positions of selectively methylated cyclomaltoheptaose (β‐cyclodextrin, CD) and, depending on the synthetic route, by a subsequent permethylation step. Each of the regioisomeric mono‐oct‐7‐enylated permethylated β‐cyclodextrin derivatives was anchored by hydrosilylation to a hydridomethyldimethylsiloxane copolymer to yield unambiguously O‐2‐, O‐3‐, and O‐6‐bonded chiral stationary phases (CSP) of Chirasil‐Dex, which were evaluated in enantioselective gas chromatography (GC). O‐6‐Chirasil‐Dex displayed slightly inferior enantioselectivity relative to either O‐3‐ or O‐2‐Chirasil‐Dex. The statistical synthesis of the CSP by mono‐oct‐7‐enylation of β‐CD under varying reactions conditions (base, solvent), without the use of hydroxy group protection chemistry, furnished a mixture of O‐6‐ and O‐2‐Chirasil‐Dex in dimethylformamide and predominantly the O‐2‐regioisomer in dimethyl sulfoxide. Chirasil‐Dex, previously formulated exclusively as the O‐6 regioisomer, should be revised as an O‐2‐ and O‐6‐Chirasil‐Dex mixture. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2003)