Synthesis of Two-Dimensional Antenna Array Using Independent Compression Regions

Compressive Sensing in Electromagnetics - A Review

“…More in detail, a satisfactory matching (i.e., normalized integral errors below 10 À4 ) has been reached with a 35%-40% element reduction with respect to the corresponding fully populated arrangements affording the same patterns [21,55]. Similar results have been also yielded by combining the BCS method with other techniques such as the matrix pencil method (MPM) [58].…”

“…The design of unequally spaced arrays through CS strategies has attracted a great attention within the electromagnetics community, as confirmed by the recent list of publications (e.g., [21][22][23][55][56][57][58]). …”

Wavelet-Based Compressive Imaging of Sparse Targets

“…Such an increased interest is clearly proved by the wide number of publications in several heterogeneous domains (e.g., microwave [5]- [10][12]- [17], radar [2]- [4] [11] [18] [19], and through-the-wall [20] [21] imaging, but also DoA retrieval [22]- [24], array diagnosis [25], and array synthesis [26]- [32]) and special sessions in relevant international conferences [33] [34] as well as special issues in leading-edge journals [35] dedicated to this topic usually indicated as Compressive Sensing (CS). The reasons for this success are twofold.…”

Corrections to “Synthesis of Two-Dimensional Antenna Array Using Independent Compression Regions” [Jan 13 449-453]

“…In [1], the mathematical formulation has an improper representation. Specifically, according to [1, Fig.…”

“…Specifically, according to [1, Fig. 1], the correct formulation for [1,Eq. (2)] should be (1) where and represent the array factor associated to the reference array located in and , respectively. From the proposal of segmenting the array factor into independent regions and the convenience to separate each array factor into real and imaginary components, the array factors and should be correctly represented as In this way, the antenna array factor can be decomposed as (4) where (5) and (6) Equations (3) and (4) in the original paper are not correct and should be replaced by the new (5) and (6) shown above.…”