2012
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2012.2221452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of Uniform Amplitude Focused Beam Arrays

Abstract: Abstract-An iterative procedure for the synthesis of uniform amplitude focused beam arrays is presented. Specifically, the goal is to optimize the locations of a fixed number of array elements with known excitations in order to synthesize narrow-beam low-sidelobe patterns. Any fixed elements excitations can be handled, although uniform amplitude and equiphase excitations are aimed because of their practical interest. Moreover, the method can be applied to both linear and planar arrays, and there is no restrict… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The array satisfies the constraints with slightly better sidelobe, i.e. below -20dB, than those obtained in literature [9], [14]. The reason is attributed to the use of embedded element patterns having a cosine-like pattern.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The array satisfies the constraints with slightly better sidelobe, i.e. below -20dB, than those obtained in literature [9], [14]. The reason is attributed to the use of embedded element patterns having a cosine-like pattern.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…w n = 1, and the array forms a focused (pencil) beam with minimum side-lobe levels (SLL) by optimizing the position of elements. Following the method proposed in [14], the problem can be formulated as a convex problem and solved by a sequential convex optimization scheme.…”
Section: B Synthesis Of Focused Beam Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On top of being easy to implement and computationally effective, the method can be readily extended to synthesize uniform amplitude planar arrays as detailed in [7]. Moreover there is no restriction regarding the element patterns and stepped amplitude excitations can also be handled.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider a planar array with M elements, where the m th element has a pattern of gmfalse(θ,0.166667emφfalse) and is fed by a complex excitation of wm. The far‐field response of the planar array can be expressed as ffalse(θ,4ptφfalse)=false∑m=1Mgmfalse(θ,0.166667emφfalse)wmej2π(uxm+vym), where xm and ym denote the location of the m th element in the wavelengths, which are arbitrary, but fixed and known, and u=sin(θ)cos(φ),v=sin(θ)sin(φ). Here, we denote (θ0,φ0) as the desired direction, which yields u0=sinfalse(θ0false)cosfalse(φ0false) and v0=sinfalse(θ0false)sinfalse(φ0false). We also define an undesired region S , which includes all undesired directions.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also assume that gnfalse(θ,0.166667emφfalse)=1false/M for all θ and φ . For numerical implementation, we approximate the constraint tr( A ( θ , φ ) W ) ≤ ρ for all ( θ , φ ) ∈ S in (4) as trboldAfalse(θp,φqfalse)boldWρ,for0.333333empfalse{1,0.166667em2,0.166667em,4ptNθandqfalse{1,0.166667em2,0.166667em,0.166667emNφfalse}, where (θp,φq) denotes one of NθNφ sample points in the undesired region S . For the following analysis, we fixed the desired direction as false(u0,0.166667emv0false)=false(0,0.166667em0false).…”
Section: Numerical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%