2006
DOI: 10.1002/adem.200600020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, Shape‐Memory Functionality and Hydrolytical Degradation Studies on Polymer Networks from Poly(rac‐lactide)‐b‐poly(propylene oxide)‐b‐poly(rac‐lactide) dimethacrylates

Abstract: ber of hydrogen bonds. In the case of PLLA 7 % water content, all are implicated in at least one hydrogen bond and a number of them in more than one.In summary, it can be stated that a major reason for the faster degradation of PGA, in comparison to PLLA, is the considerably faster swelling which is most likely caused by a much higher solubility of water in PGA than in PLLA. The major structural reason for this behaviour seems to be the presence of an extra nonpolar methyl group in PLLA that leads to a reduced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
60
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[24] (Co)monomers from these established implant materials are also being employed for the development of biodegradable shape-memory polymers with a high potential for new applications in the field of minimally invasive surgery. [25][26][27] Some polymers from this family, together with other relevant degradable polyesters studied in Section 3.1, are listed in Table 1, including some thermal and mechanical properties as well as an indicative time period to complete resorption (extracted from [20,24,[28][29][30][31][32] ). It should be noticed that this table is compiled from different literature sources in which the procedures to determine the listed properties were by no means standardized.…”
Section: Basics Of Hydrolytic Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24] (Co)monomers from these established implant materials are also being employed for the development of biodegradable shape-memory polymers with a high potential for new applications in the field of minimally invasive surgery. [25][26][27] Some polymers from this family, together with other relevant degradable polyesters studied in Section 3.1, are listed in Table 1, including some thermal and mechanical properties as well as an indicative time period to complete resorption (extracted from [20,24,[28][29][30][31][32] ). It should be noticed that this table is compiled from different literature sources in which the procedures to determine the listed properties were by no means standardized.…”
Section: Basics Of Hydrolytic Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can change their shape, hydroabsorbency, water vapor permeability, self-cleaning ability, and optical and other properties when external stimuli change. 7,8 Their shape-memory effects, including shape fixity and shape recovery, are influenced by many factors, such as the soft-segment length, hard-segment content, and thermomechanical conditions. 9,10 Generally, the softsegment phase and hard-segment domains play the roles of the reversible phase and fixed phase in the shape-memory effect, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymer samples having one T g related to a mixed phase displayed switching temperatures T sw between 12°C and 30°C with comparably high shape fixity rates from 92 % to 96 %, while shape recovery rates were significantly improved from 87 % to 99 % with increasing poly(rac-lactide) block length. [22] COMMUNICATIONS 494…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymer samples having one T g related to a mixed phase displayed switching temperatures T sw between 12°C and 30°C with comparably high shape fixity rates from 92 % to 96 %, while shape recovery rates were significantly improved from 87 % to 99 % with increasing poly(rac-lactide) block length. [22] In this article an alternative concept for the introduction of a second amorphous phase is presented using DM as oligomeric crosslinker for polyacrylates forming amorphous AB copolymer networks. The aim is to retain the poly[(L-lactide)-ran-glycolide)] segments forming the phase with the high glass transition temperature T g,h as network component but to incorporate a second amorphous phase with a low glass transition temperature (T g,l ), which keeps the material elastic even below T g,h of the poly[(L-lactide)-ran-glycolide)]-phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%