2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, structural and computational studies of new tetrazole derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 1 H NMR spectrum of the product, the methyl protons appear at 2.55 ppm (vs 2.49 ppm in 5‐methyl‐1H‐tetrazole); [33] thus not in the anisotropic region of the bottom ring. It suggests that treating 17 with sodium azide in refluxing acetonitrile produced compound 18 as its A rotamer (Scheme 10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the 1 H NMR spectrum of the product, the methyl protons appear at 2.55 ppm (vs 2.49 ppm in 5‐methyl‐1H‐tetrazole); [33] thus not in the anisotropic region of the bottom ring. It suggests that treating 17 with sodium azide in refluxing acetonitrile produced compound 18 as its A rotamer (Scheme 10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Quantum calculations including molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) and binding energy were utilized to find out the reason for the different chemical stabilities among NIC-OA polymorphs and NIC. MEP has been widely used to explore the weak interaction sites in crystal engineering , and distinguish the electrophilic and nucleophilic regions in molecules . Herein, the structure of NIC and the asymmetric unit of each NIC-OA salt polymorph both in vacuum (Figure ) and in the conformations optimized in water (Figure S12) were analyzed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HOMO/LUMO energy gap constitutes a critical parameter in determining, for instance, molecular electrical transport properties [18,19]. The global chemical reactivity descriptors calculated for the ( E ) and ( Z ) isomer of the title compound using DFT are: electron affinity (A), chemical potential (μ), ionization potential (IP), chemical hardness (η), electronegativity (χ), and electrophilicity (ɷ), (Table 5) [20]. The calculated energy gap between HOMO and LUMO of the ( E ) isomer is 0.1132 Hartree (3.0811 eV), while for the ( Z ) isomer, it is larger with 0.12022 Hartree (3.2715 eV) demonstrating that the ( Z ) isomer is harder, more stable, and less reactive than the ( E ) isomer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%