2014
DOI: 10.1021/om500585j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, Structure, and Bonding Properties of Ruthenium Complexes Possessing a Boron-Based PBP Pincer Ligand and Their Application for Catalytic Hydrogenation

Abstract: In addition to our previous works for PBP-pincer metal complexes, four PBP-pincer Ru complexes, [PBP]Ru(Cl)(CO) (2), [PBP]Ru(CO)(η2-BH4) (3), [PBP](μ-H)2Ru(OAc-κ2 O) (4), and [PBP](μ-H)2Ru(η2-BH4) (5) were synthesized. All the obtained complexes were characterized by NMR and IR spectroscopy, X-ray crystallography, elemental analysis, and DFT calculation with AIM analysis. Through the structural analysis, two types of interaction between boron atoms and ruthenium atoms in 3–5 were revealed. One is the typical t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ru1–B1 bond length is 2.086(2) Å, which is comparable to a two-center-two-electron (2c-2e) Ru–B bond length in previously reported ruthenium diazaborolyl PBP pincer complexes (2.022(4)–2.080(14) Å). 2 , 7 – 9 The short Ru1···B2 (2.417(2) Å) and Ru···H2 (1.96(2) Å) distances are indicative of a strong bridging B–H···Ru interaction. This apparently strong 3c-2e bond attracts the metal center to the B2 vertex, and, as a consequence, results in a significant distortion of the vicinal 2c-2e Ru1–B1 bond.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ru1–B1 bond length is 2.086(2) Å, which is comparable to a two-center-two-electron (2c-2e) Ru–B bond length in previously reported ruthenium diazaborolyl PBP pincer complexes (2.022(4)–2.080(14) Å). 2 , 7 – 9 The short Ru1···B2 (2.417(2) Å) and Ru···H2 (1.96(2) Å) distances are indicative of a strong bridging B–H···Ru interaction. This apparently strong 3c-2e bond attracts the metal center to the B2 vertex, and, as a consequence, results in a significant distortion of the vicinal 2c-2e Ru1–B1 bond.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex 66 adopts a four coordination square planar structure, in which N 2 coordinates with the cobalt center trans to the boron atom. By reacting with RuH(OAc)(PPh 3 ) 2 , Yamashita et al [58] further synthesized complex PBP-(μ-H) 2 Ru(OAc-κ 2 O). Interestingly, this PBP-(μ-H) 2 Ru(OAcκ 2 O) (67, Figure 28) possesses two Ru-H-B bridge bonds.…”
Section: Figure 26mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[PBP](μ-H) 2 Ru(OAc-κ 2 O) (67) was found to be the catalyst for the hydrogenation of 1-hexanal under 6 MPa H 2 with low catalyst loadings (0.01 mol%). [58] The catalytic transfer dehydrogenation reactions were also been achieved with the sp 2 boron-based LA-TM catalysts ( Figure 32). [63] By using PBP-Ir complex 65, cyclooctane can be catalytic transfer dehydrogenated to tert-butylethylene.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…72 Reaction of 1a with Ru(H)(Cl)(CO)(PPh 3 ) 3 furnished (PBP)Ru(Cl)(CO) complex 65. Treatment of 65 with NaBH 4 resulted in a substitution of the chloride ligand with tetrahydroborate to afford (PBP)Ru-(CO)(η 2 -BH 4 ) (66).…”
Section: Group 10 Metalmentioning
confidence: 99%