2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-328x(00)00034-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, structure and reactivity of homobimetallic Rh(I) and Ir(I) complexes of s- and as-indacene-diide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
56
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
10
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case where two different pathways were used, implying various reactional intermediates but the same deprotonation/metallation procedures, it seems reasonable to envisage that the same hypothesis (dominant influence of the COD ligand) could explain the identical ratio obtained for the two paths. Meanwhile, this chelating olefin affords a smaller excess of the syn isomer than that obtained for sindacenediide spacer (90%) [13]. This presumably results from the slightly higher hindrance of the alkylated s-indacene compared to that of the unsubstituted analogue.…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our case where two different pathways were used, implying various reactional intermediates but the same deprotonation/metallation procedures, it seems reasonable to envisage that the same hypothesis (dominant influence of the COD ligand) could explain the identical ratio obtained for the two paths. Meanwhile, this chelating olefin affords a smaller excess of the syn isomer than that obtained for sindacenediide spacer (90%) [13]. This presumably results from the slightly higher hindrance of the alkylated s-indacene compared to that of the unsubstituted analogue.…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Among them, we can cite: the structures and the relative stabilities of both the lithiated intermediates and the metal dimers, the steric hindrance, the solvent effect (THF), the influence of the ancillary ligand of rhodium (COD vs. CO). Ceccon et al [13] who studied in more details this aspect, concluded that the role of ligand seems preponderant: a large preference for the syn isomer was observed with ancillary ligands as COD or NBD and for the anti form with CO. In our case where two different pathways were used, implying various reactional intermediates but the same deprotonation/metallation procedures, it seems reasonable to envisage that the same hypothesis (dominant influence of the COD ligand) could explain the identical ratio obtained for the two paths.…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyalkyl-s-indacenes have been synthesized and studied for the last fifty years for their use as ligands or spacers in the synthesis of binuclear complexes, in conducting polymers or biological compounds [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. However, literature reports only some examples of s-indacenyl and substituted s-indacenyl radical ions [16,19] and to the best of our knowledge no examples of substituted s-indacenyl radicals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To (ii) frozen in liquid nitrogen was added a solution of Cp 2 Fe + BF 4 À in dichloromethane and the ESR spectrum was recorded at 243 K.…”
Section: Preparation Of III A-f and V; Esr Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their potential use as ligands or spacers in the synthesis of binuclear complexes, conducting polymers and biological compounds, polyalkyl-s-indacenes and polyalkyl-1,5-dihydro-sindacenes, as well as some of their radical anions, radical cations or radicals have been prepared and studied [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%