“…Among them, we can cite: the structures and the relative stabilities of both the lithiated intermediates and the metal dimers, the steric hindrance, the solvent effect (THF), the influence of the ancillary ligand of rhodium (COD vs. CO). Ceccon et al [13] who studied in more details this aspect, concluded that the role of ligand seems preponderant: a large preference for the syn isomer was observed with ancillary ligands as COD or NBD and for the anti form with CO. In our case where two different pathways were used, implying various reactional intermediates but the same deprotonation/metallation procedures, it seems reasonable to envisage that the same hypothesis (dominant influence of the COD ligand) could explain the identical ratio obtained for the two paths.…”