2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2015.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, structures and properties of two new chiral rare earth-organic frameworks constructed by l/d-tartaric acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, each enantiomeric pair (M-Cu1/M-Cu2 or M-Cu3/M-Cu4) shows a CD profile as an exact mirror image . Moreover, the Cotton effect centered at 360 nm in M-Cu1, M-Cu2, M-Cu3, and M-Cu4 should belong to the chiral aa -SB base fragment, it not being surprising that the dichroic signals present opposite signs for each enantiomeric pair (positive in the case of M-Cu1 and M-Cu3 and negative for M-Cu2 and M-Cu4), as has also been reported for other enantiomeric coordination compounds using pure isomers like proline and tartaric acid . The absorption at 660 nm centered on the Cu­(II) metal cation presents a negative Cotton effect in M-Cu1/M-Cu3 and a positive Cotton effect in M-Cu2/M-Cu4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, each enantiomeric pair (M-Cu1/M-Cu2 or M-Cu3/M-Cu4) shows a CD profile as an exact mirror image . Moreover, the Cotton effect centered at 360 nm in M-Cu1, M-Cu2, M-Cu3, and M-Cu4 should belong to the chiral aa -SB base fragment, it not being surprising that the dichroic signals present opposite signs for each enantiomeric pair (positive in the case of M-Cu1 and M-Cu3 and negative for M-Cu2 and M-Cu4), as has also been reported for other enantiomeric coordination compounds using pure isomers like proline and tartaric acid . The absorption at 660 nm centered on the Cu­(II) metal cation presents a negative Cotton effect in M-Cu1/M-Cu3 and a positive Cotton effect in M-Cu2/M-Cu4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chirality character of synthetic CMOFs come from the enantiomeric nature of D-tartaric acid. Subsequently, the chiral organic ligand-based CMOFs gradually develop, and the literature has reported the use of many small molecules with chiral selectivity, such as amino acids and their derivatives, [40][41][42][43][44] tartaric acid derivatives, 45,46 and modified 1,1′-binaphthalene-2,2′-diol (BINOL) derivatives [47][48][49] for the construction of CMOFs. This review will also describe some new type of CMOFs which were constructed by introducing some changes into the synthesis process.…”
Section: Chiral Ligands Constructing Cmofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2000, Kim and co-workers reported the synthesis of chiral MOFs from the enantiopure tartaric-acid-derived bridging ligands, [Zn 3 [44]. Subsequently, the method has been developed, and many research papers have been reported that use naturally occurring enantiopure amino acids and their derivatives [45][46][47][48], tartaric acid derivatives [49,50], and modified 1,1 -binaphthalene-2,2 -diol (BINOL) derivatives [51][52][53] for designing chiral MOFs. Recently, the approach of synthesis has been extended widely with some alteration, which will be described in the review.…”
Section: Chiral Mofs Prepared From Chiral Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 99%