2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2013.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, thermodynamic properties and BSA interaction of a new Valen Shiff base derived from o-vanillin and trimethoprim

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to equations and using K 2 = 2/3, n = 1.36 and Φ = 0.15 for BSA , the following data are obtained: J = 1.74 × 10 ‐16 cm 3 /L/mol, R 0 = 1.28 nm, r = 1.54 nm and E = 25.47% for the DHA–BSA system; and J = 2.62 × 10 ‐16 cm 3 /L/mol, R 0 = 1.37 nm, r = 1.65 nm and E = 25.07% for the ART–BSA system. The observed donor–acceptor distances ( r ) of the two systems are < 8 nm, again indicating that static quenching interactions occurred between BSA and DHA/ART . The average distance of BSA–DHA is smaller than that of BSA–ART, indicating that the interaction between DHA and BSA is stronger than between ART and BSA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…According to equations and using K 2 = 2/3, n = 1.36 and Φ = 0.15 for BSA , the following data are obtained: J = 1.74 × 10 ‐16 cm 3 /L/mol, R 0 = 1.28 nm, r = 1.54 nm and E = 25.47% for the DHA–BSA system; and J = 2.62 × 10 ‐16 cm 3 /L/mol, R 0 = 1.37 nm, r = 1.65 nm and E = 25.07% for the ART–BSA system. The observed donor–acceptor distances ( r ) of the two systems are < 8 nm, again indicating that static quenching interactions occurred between BSA and DHA/ART . The average distance of BSA–DHA is smaller than that of BSA–ART, indicating that the interaction between DHA and BSA is stronger than between ART and BSA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The dilution enthalpy of 4 H 2 O(l) as one of the products in the reaction (1) in the solution C is within the range of experimental error and cannot be detected by the existing isoperibol solution calorimetry. According to the literature [14], the amount of H 2 O(l) was very small in accordance with the stoichiometric number of H 2 O(l) in the reaction, which can be omitted, i.e., D s H m H (5) = 0 kJ mol -1 .…”
Section: Determination Of Dissolution Enthalpies Of Reactants and Promentioning
confidence: 96%