2005
DOI: 10.1258/1355819052801804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods

Abstract: We identify a number of procedural, conceptual and theoretical issues that need to be addressed in moving forward with this area, and emphasise the need for existing techniques to be evaluated and modified, rather than inventing new approaches.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
612
0
11

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 767 publications
(623 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
612
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…As many authors and journal editors are well aware, the narrative review is not a poor cousin of the systematic review but a different and potentially complementary form of scholarship 22, 44. Nevertheless, the simplistic hierarchy “systematic review good; narrative review less good” persists in some circles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As many authors and journal editors are well aware, the narrative review is not a poor cousin of the systematic review but a different and potentially complementary form of scholarship 22, 44. Nevertheless, the simplistic hierarchy “systematic review good; narrative review less good” persists in some circles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings were then reported in a narrative style based on similarities and dissimilarities observed between studies utilising similar outcome measures. Synthesis of evidence from qualitative studies was undertaken using a thematic analysis approach (by the two authors), 25 which involved identifying prominent and recurring themes across study findings exploring barriers and facilitators to healthcare. A summary table was employed to improve transparency, assist with reflecting on the frequency or weight of themes and conduct cross-study analysis.…”
Section: Data Synthesis and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Articulating the nature of the influence of organisational culture on the implementation of health sector reforms was largely based on judgements and new insights beyond those of the primary studies, in keeping with the aim of an interpretive synthesis [25]. The interpretations arrived at in this review suggest that: (a) power distance impacts on communication, management styles, commitment and participation in decision-making; (b) institutional collectivism impacts on management practices and participation in decision-making; (c) uncertainty avoidance impacts on decision-making and commitment; and (d) in-group collectivism impacts on commitment, as summarised in Figure 3 above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although founded on the principles of systematic review [24,25], such an approach goes beyond a review of literature to generate new concepts and meanings from synthesis of the collated work [25,26]. These new ideas are, in essence, analytic generalisations of potential relevance in settings beyond those specifically considered in the papers reviewed [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%