“…3, the redox behavior in 1 and 2 is dominated by the two reversible Ru 2+ / Ru 3+ redox couples (E 1/2 at 0.05 and 0.57 V in 1; 0.10 and 0.27 V in 2) and reversible ferrocene-based Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ redox couples (E 1/2 at 0.86 V in 1; 0.73 and 0.87 V in 2) vs. Ag/AgCl. For complex 3, one reversible Ru 2+ /Ru 3+ redox couple (E 1/2 at 0.14 V) and three (7); Fe1-C2, 2.026(7); Fe1-C3, 2.027(6); Fe1-C4, 2.048(7); Fe1-C5, 2.037(7); Fe1-C6, 2.072(7); Fe1-C7, 2.035(6); Fe1-C8, 2.033(6); Fe1-C9, 2.026(7); Fe1-C10, 2.041(7); Fe2-C11, 2.093(7); Fe2-C12, 2.085(7); Fe2-C13, 2.075(7); Fe2-C14, 2.077(7); Fe2-C15, 2.087(7); Fe2-C17, 1.883 (9) Quasi-reversible and irreversible waves were observed in the CV measurements of complexes 1 [20], [(g 5 -C 5 H 5 )(PPh 3 ) 2 Ru-C"C-Ph] [35], [(g 5 -C 5 H 5 )(PPh 3 ) 2 Ru-C"C-fc] (fc = ferrocenyl) [30], and [(g 5 -C 5 H 5 )(dppe)Ru-C"C-fc]. Therefore, differential pulse voltammetry was employed to obtain better-resolved potential information in our study, because the Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ redox process for 2 and 3 was quasi-reversible in the CV experiment.…”