2016
DOI: 10.1137/15m1036063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic Aperture Imaging of Direction- and Frequency-Dependent Reflectivities

Abstract: We introduce a synthetic aperture imaging framework that takes into consideration directional dependence of the reflectivity that is to be imaged, as well as its frequency dependence. We use an 1 minimization approach that is coordinated with data segmentation so as to fuse information from multiple sub-apertures and frequency sub-bands. We analyze this approach from first principles and assess its performance with numerical simulations in an X-band radar regime.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us change variables w = ω − ω o and use the notation 8) and integrate next over ω. We obtain after rearranging the terms that κ( y, z, z ) ≈ πN with notation We also have from ∆ = O(1) and definition (D.11) that both |ζ| and | ζ| are O(1).…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us change variables w = ω − ω o and use the notation 8) and integrate next over ω. We obtain after rearranging the terms that κ( y, z, z ) ≈ πN with notation We also have from ∆ = O(1) and definition (D.11) that both |ζ| and | ζ| are O(1).…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second goal of the paper is to explain how the theory applies to SAR imaging. The study [8] is proof of concept that MMV can be used to image direction dependent reflectivities from data gathered over multiple sub-apertures. However, it does not provide a resolution analysis and it does not demonstrate the advantage of using MMV over imaging with a single sub-aperture at a time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, there are other configurations such as multiple frequency imaging with several transmitters and receivers for which this factorization is not feasible. Still, we show that factorization (2) approximately holds under the paraxial approximation, i.e., when the image region is far from the array and is small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…, K, be the fields at the grid positions y k in the IW, with g( y k ; ω) given by (5). Then, the data depend on the vector l = [g (1) f (ω) , g (2) f (ω) , . .…”
Section: Single Frequency Signals and Multiple Receiversmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation