2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-018-0004-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic Freestream Disturbance for the Numerical Reproduction of Experimental Zero-Pressure-Gradient Bypass Transition Test Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the Klein et al. (2003) digital filter technique, generalised and validated to the present numerical set-up (Pinto & Lodato 2019; Lodato, Tonicello & Pinto 2021), the mean profiles, to which perturbations are superposed, have been evaluated using closed-form relations involving van Driest transformed velocity as described by Touber (2010). Given the correlation tensor of the fluid velocity and typical length scales of the desired turbulence field, realistic velocity fluctuations are prescribed at the inlet boundaries, far enough from the flow zone of interest.…”
Section: Compression/expansion Ramp Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Klein et al. (2003) digital filter technique, generalised and validated to the present numerical set-up (Pinto & Lodato 2019; Lodato, Tonicello & Pinto 2021), the mean profiles, to which perturbations are superposed, have been evaluated using closed-form relations involving van Driest transformed velocity as described by Touber (2010). Given the correlation tensor of the fluid velocity and typical length scales of the desired turbulence field, realistic velocity fluctuations are prescribed at the inlet boundaries, far enough from the flow zone of interest.…”
Section: Compression/expansion Ramp Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It gives a scheme order of p + 1. The SD method is becoming quite mature with simulations of wall bounded-turbulent flows 2016), bypass transition (Pinto and Lodato 2019;Lodato et al 2021); shocks and detonations (Gupta et al 2018;Lodato 2019;Tofailli et al 2021) and with moving meshes (Yu et al 2011;Zhang et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It gives a scheme order of p + 1. The SD method is becoming quite mature with simulations of wall bounded-turbulent flows 2016), bypass transition (Pinto and Lodato 2019;Lodato et al 2021); shocks and detonations (Gupta et al 2018;Lodato 2019;Tofailli et al 2021) and with moving meshes (Yu et al 2011;Zhang et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%