Proceedings of the XIII Internarional Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icgpr.2010.5550215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic GPR modelling studies on shallow geological properties and its comparison with the real data

Abstract: The synthetic GPR modelling studies are quite important to evaluate the interpretation of shallow geological properties such as faulting, bedding, weathering etc. This study aims to simulate some shallow geological structures by GPR technique. To obtain a successful interpretation, we performed the synthetic modelling studies for paleoseismology, sedimentary and geotechnical problems using different values of electricalproperties that affect the radar signals. During the modelling studies, we produced a lot of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of GPR modelling is essential in advancing the GPR interpretation as it can provide additional information on targets by accurately reproducing the response of subsurface materials to electromagnetic (EM) waves. By simulating the propagation of these waves through different types of subsurface materials with various geometries, numerical modelling can reproduce how EM waves interact with the expected subsurface features, such as buried objects (Diamanti & Annan, 2019; González‐Huici & Giovanneschi, 2013; Kelly et al., 2021), geological structures (Giannopoulos & Diamanti, 2008; Öztürk & Drahor, 2010), water content variations (Bano, 2006), as well as a glaciers’ internal structure (Hunziker et al., 2023; Moran et al., 2003). This information can further be used to discriminate between real subsurface features and coherent noise or artefacts that can hinder interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of GPR modelling is essential in advancing the GPR interpretation as it can provide additional information on targets by accurately reproducing the response of subsurface materials to electromagnetic (EM) waves. By simulating the propagation of these waves through different types of subsurface materials with various geometries, numerical modelling can reproduce how EM waves interact with the expected subsurface features, such as buried objects (Diamanti & Annan, 2019; González‐Huici & Giovanneschi, 2013; Kelly et al., 2021), geological structures (Giannopoulos & Diamanti, 2008; Öztürk & Drahor, 2010), water content variations (Bano, 2006), as well as a glaciers’ internal structure (Hunziker et al., 2023; Moran et al., 2003). This information can further be used to discriminate between real subsurface features and coherent noise or artefacts that can hinder interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical modeling of GPR is considered to be an alternative interpretation approach [17] and has been extensively applied to a number of GPR applications, among them are: the detection of dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) [20], [21], the detection of geological targets like faults and caves [22], [23], for tunnel inspections [24], detecting and assessing pipes [25], in the inspection and condition assessment of bridges [26], [27], for forensic applications [28], mineral exploration [29], and airborne GPR [30]. In the case of GPR numerical modeling for landmine detection, generic types of antennas over simple targets buried in both homogenous and inhomogeneous soils have been modeled by [31]- [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%