2017
DOI: 10.5380/rsa.v17i3.50268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic Polymers on Water Retention and Pore Distribuition in a Clayey Latosol

Abstract: Abstract:The use of polymers is increasing at the agricultural area, however their effects on soil porosity have been little studied. The objective of this article is to analyze the effects of applied synthetic polymers on soil porosity and water retention of a Dystroferric Red Latosol. This study was conducted on undisturbed samples collected at a depth of 0.05 m in a Latosol beneath native forest. The samples were saturated with distilled water and polymers HyC, HyA, HyB diluted in water according to use rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the soil water balance was cumulative, in the start of spring, there may have been a soil water deficit, soon met by irrigation. Furthermore, Benevenute et al (2016) claim attention is necessary to avoid errors when managing the soil moisture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the soil water balance was cumulative, in the start of spring, there may have been a soil water deficit, soon met by irrigation. Furthermore, Benevenute et al (2016) claim attention is necessary to avoid errors when managing the soil moisture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The irrigation water depth (LI) applied was determined by the ETc measured by the lysimeters. Volumetric soil moisture at field capacity (q fc ) considered corresponded to the soil water matric poten-tial Ψ m = 10 kPa, according to Benevenute et al (2016). Current soil moisture (q c ) as a function of Ψ mc (current soil water matric potential) was calculated by mean values of the soil water retention curve, obtained from a tension table and by a Richards extractor, in a laboratory of soil and water quality analyses adjusted by the van Genuchten equation (van Genuchten, 1980):…”
Section: Crop Coefficients Of Forage Cropsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the sensor was inserted in a clayey red latosol with the following composition: 0.65 kg kg −1 clay, 0.21 kg kg −1 silt, and 0.14 kg kg −1 sand; and a second test was carried out to measure its output as a function of small differences in matric potentials. When the water retention curve of this soil was measured for small matric potentials between 1 kPa and 35 kPa, a practically linear behavior was observed [23].…”
Section: Measurement With the Sensor Inserted In The Soilmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The previously established irrigation interval was based on a 70% limit of the water availability factor. The moisture at field capacity (θfc) was considered to be the moisture corresponding to the value of the matrix potential, Ψm = 0.1 bar (Benevenute et al 2016). The values of current moisture (θc) were estimated by means of the soil water retention curve, which was obtained with the aid of a tensor…”
Section: Experimental Site and Foragesmentioning
confidence: 99%