2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-019-01763-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic scenario generation of monthly streamflows conditioned to the El Niño–Southern Oscillation: application to operation planning of hydrothermal systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the sake of simplicity, we consider only three inflow scenarios, i.e., N = 3 as Figure 3 shows. The set of constraints is composed of those related to the first stage ( 7)-( 8) and those associated with each possible inflow scenario ( 9)- (12). Then, Table 6 shows the optimal solution of the different variables involved in the problem.…”
Section: Stochastic Htsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the sake of simplicity, we consider only three inflow scenarios, i.e., N = 3 as Figure 3 shows. The set of constraints is composed of those related to the first stage ( 7)-( 8) and those associated with each possible inflow scenario ( 9)- (12). Then, Table 6 shows the optimal solution of the different variables involved in the problem.…”
Section: Stochastic Htsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Officially, the deterministic approach has been employed in Mexico to solve the MTHS problem. Although this approach is the basis for the stochastic programming approach, its main drawback is that it does not model the stochastic nature of the problem due to its assumption that only one scenario will occur [12]; therefore, through this approach, it is not possible to obtain a decision that considers the other possible scenarios that can also happen, and one can only obtain a decision that is optimal for a particular realization [13]. Given the stochastic nature of the MTHS problem, it is essential to consider this ingredient in the optimization model in order to obtain more accurate solutions and reduce the expected total cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth methodology consists of a Markov-switching periodic autoregressive model with -MS-PAR(p) (Treistman et al, 2020b;Pessanha et al, 2023), which is the combination of the classic PAR model with the addition of climate variables as a state model by a Markov chain. This evaluation uses the El Niño Southern Oscillation as the represented climate variable, which is one of the most impacting climate variability in the Brazilian streamflow.…”
Section: /17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Treistman et al. (2020), ENSO variables are rather treated as additional state variables modeled by a Markov chain along with the PAR(p) model for the streamflows. More recently, Mbeutcha et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pina et al (2017) propose an approach to incorporate exogenous hydrological variables (e.g., snow water equivalent, ENSO variables) into the SDDP algorithm through a MPARX model. In Treistman et al (2020) However, none of the reported extensions of the SDDP algorithm can handle low-frequency signals. The main focus of this study is to extend the SDDP algorithm so as to determine reservoir operating policies that explicitly capture shifting flow regimes due to climate variability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%