Synthetic technocracy: Dutch scientific intellectuals in science, society and culture, 1880–1950

Abstract

In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, changing social and cultural climates challenged the position of scientists in Western society. Ringer and Harwood have described how scientists reacted by adopting either pragmatist or 'comprehensive ' styles of thought. In this article, I will show how a group of Dutch intellectuals, including many scientists, came up with an alternative approach to the dilemmas of modernity, and eventually became influential in shaping Dutch society. They combined elements of both styles into what I call a 'synthetic technocrat ' ideology, a reaction against intellectual and political fragmentation. These ideas were often combined with pleas for educational reform, culminating in a plea for gebildete Tatkraft. I will analyse the development of the synthetic technocrat movement from the late nineteenth century into the 1940s. During this period, the movement became increasingly political in nature, but in a radically different way to comparable movements in other countries, especially Germany.

Adapting to new realities: an analysis of institutional work in three cases of Dutch infrastructure planning

“…This was the core assumption of a new intellectual elite that emerged in the nineteenth century across Europe (Van der Vleuten 2004). Members of this elite held an organic view of society: they believed a good national infrastructure system would contribute to the rational circulation of people and knowledge in a country and help maximise the productive potential of society (Baneke 2011). The central state, in its capacity as guardian of the public interest, was trusted with the responsibility to create these conditions by managing large-scale infrastructural projects such as roads, railways, and canals (Den Hoed and Keizer 2007).…”

Expert-influence in adapting flood governance: An institutional analysis of the spatial turns in the United States and the Netherlands

“…These engineering plans corresponded well with the ideology of the rising progressive-liberal elite in Dutch politics around the end of the 19th century, whose members preferred a more active role of the central state in public affairs (Baneke, 2011). Close bonds developed between members of this new elite and engineering association.…”

Out of a Clear Blue Sky? FOM, The Bomb, and The Boost in Dutch Physics Funding after World War II

“…4 The establishment of new research institutions had been discussed since the 1930s, and had enjoyed considerable support in scientific circles; a number of the scholars involved in these debates, people like economist Jan Tinbergen, physicist Jan Burgers and chemist Hugo R. Kruyt, would become, or already were politically engaged (Somsen, 2008). Indeed, during the interwar years a technocratic idealism that saw scientists and engineers as the perfect advisors for rational economic and social planning was popular in Holland (Baneke, 2011). These ideas originated in part from British scholar J.D.…”