1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf01301429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syringomyelia and Arnold Chiari in scoliosis initially classified as idiopathic: Experience with 25 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that the majority of abnormalities consisted of an Arnold-chiari malformation with concurrent syrinx is consistent with the majority of previous studies in the literature [2][3][4][5]7]. It is still not clear whether these intraspinal anomalies are a cause of abnormal curvature of the spine or a result of medullary traction secondary to scoliosis [19,20]. Although age at diagnosis was significantly later (3 years 7 months vs. 5 years 8 months) in those found to have a neuro-axial anomaly, there was no significant difference in Cobb angle between patients with normal (46.6°) and abnormal (45.8°) neural axes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The finding that the majority of abnormalities consisted of an Arnold-chiari malformation with concurrent syrinx is consistent with the majority of previous studies in the literature [2][3][4][5]7]. It is still not clear whether these intraspinal anomalies are a cause of abnormal curvature of the spine or a result of medullary traction secondary to scoliosis [19,20]. Although age at diagnosis was significantly later (3 years 7 months vs. 5 years 8 months) in those found to have a neuro-axial anomaly, there was no significant difference in Cobb angle between patients with normal (46.6°) and abnormal (45.8°) neural axes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Although the present study included only patients with severe AIS requiring surgery (Cobb angle >43°), we did not find a higher incidence of structural spinal intradural pathologies compared with other reports in which cases with less severe scoliosis were also included [3,5,7,10,11,16,19]. We found structural intradural pathology in 3 of 100 AIS patients (3%) who presented without any obvious neurological deficits.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…The diagnosis of IS is one of exclusion, and should be made after excluding other underlying etiologic factors including neuromuscular or skeletal congenital anomalies, or inflammatory or demyelinizing processes [1,2]. In some patients with neural axis abnormalities, scoliosis could be the only clinical sign, and would always be falsely classified as an ''idiopathic'' form [3,4]. Previous studies have demonstrated that the existence of neural axis abnormalities would add the risks of neurologic injury during correction surgery for scoliosis [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the routine use of MRI is controversial, and the indications for MRI in presumed ''idiopathic'' scoliosis vary from study to study [7][8][9][10]. Many predictive factors, including curve pattern, age, gender, radiographic parameters and the presence of abnormal findings on the history or physical examination have been proposed when deciding whether or not to image the neural axis in patients with presumed ''idiopathic'' scoliosis [4][5][6][7][8]. Among these factors, curve pattern may be the most widely recognized and simplest sign to predict the presence of neural axis abnormalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%