2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92997-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SysML Models Verification and Validation in an Industrial Context: Challenges and Experimentation

Abstract: This paper presents a solution for SysML model verification and validation, with a return of experience from its implementation in an industrial context. We present this solution as a way to overcome issues regarding the use of SysML in an industrial context. We contribute by providing a method and a list of the existing challenges and experimentation results. We advocate the need to have semantics for SysML models without having to define a full domain-specific modeling language. We highlight the work, requir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 11 mixed‐perception attributes could indicate areas of MBSE that are not consistently understood and agreed upon by the SE community. For example, regarding Applicability , Beery & Paulo 44 believe there is “potential utility and applicability of the utilization of MBSE to support [Mission Engineering] through an analysis of the early stage design for a naval mine warfare system.” This positive claim about MBSE's applicability contrasts with Baduel et al 45 . who claim, “SysML on its own is not the best suited to apply a development method or build meaningful models in systems engineering.” In the case of Applicability , their disagreements reflect the specificity of the applications discussed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The 11 mixed‐perception attributes could indicate areas of MBSE that are not consistently understood and agreed upon by the SE community. For example, regarding Applicability , Beery & Paulo 44 believe there is “potential utility and applicability of the utilization of MBSE to support [Mission Engineering] through an analysis of the early stage design for a naval mine warfare system.” This positive claim about MBSE's applicability contrasts with Baduel et al 45 . who claim, “SysML on its own is not the best suited to apply a development method or build meaningful models in systems engineering.” In the case of Applicability , their disagreements reflect the specificity of the applications discussed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A MBD review is a design review in a design process where models replace the traditional documentcentric approach. When a design relies on the widespread adoption of models, we observe that all stakeholders involved in the design process must cope with new challenges such as the learning of new languages and modelling environments (Herzog et al, 2005(Herzog et al, , 2014, the interdependencies among models (Baduel et al, 2018), the consistency among multiple modelling views (Herzog et al, 2005), etc.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Douglas (Douglas, 2017) defined a rule set for use with UML and SysML specifically tailored for the Rhapsody tool set. Baduel, Chami, Burel, and Ober described a corporate-specific approaching combining the use of domain experts to check compliance with external "real-world" attributes against a set of criteria and of OCL to verify conformance with syntax rules and for a product line of train control systems (Baduel, et al, 2018). Vinarcik and Jukovic have developed a Digital Engineering profile containing hundreds of specific automated verification rules that check for violations of their own standards and have placed them in the public domain (Vinarcik & Jugovich, 2020).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%