2018
DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2018.1524051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System advisor model (SAM) simulation modelling of a concentrating solar thermal power plant with comparison to actual performance data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These user-friendly and budget-friendly tools combine wind resource models, such as the WIND Toolkit, with power curve databases and loss assumptions to produce site-specific annual energy production estimates. While validations of SAM exist for solar technology using actual plant performance data (Freeman et al, 2013;Rudié et al, 2014;Ezeanya et al, 2018;Freeman et al, 2019), we were unable to determine similar validations of SAM for small wind systems. Similarly, no validation of Wind Report using turbine production observations was able to be identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…These user-friendly and budget-friendly tools combine wind resource models, such as the WIND Toolkit, with power curve databases and loss assumptions to produce site-specific annual energy production estimates. While validations of SAM exist for solar technology using actual plant performance data (Freeman et al, 2013;Rudié et al, 2014;Ezeanya et al, 2018;Freeman et al, 2019), we were unable to determine similar validations of SAM for small wind systems. Similarly, no validation of Wind Report using turbine production observations was able to be identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The tool facilitates sensitivity and parametric analyses, studies of weather variability (P50/P90), and Monte Carlo simulation [26]. Several studies on CSP techno-economics have been conducted using this tool, such as that presented in [14,16,27,28].…”
Section: Methodology and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literature review, it can be seen that the performance analysis of CSP plants has been performed using simulation tools including SAM: 2021-12-02 [35], IPSEpro7.0 [14], Epsilon15.0 [23], Transys18.0 [36], Matlab2019 [27], Modelica3.5 [37], and other relevant software utilizing the material and energy balance approach based on the thermodynamics' first and second laws. In this study, the IPSEpro software (CSP library) is used in the numerical simulation of the 50 MW CSP plant [38,39].…”
Section: Methods and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%