2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System analysis of synonymous codon usage biases in archaeal virus genomes

Abstract: Recent studies of geothermally heated aquatic ecosystems have found widely divergent viruses with unusual morphotypes. Archaeal viruses isolated from these hot habitats usually have double-stranded DNA genomes, linear or circular, and can infect members of the Archaea domain. In this study, the synonymous codon usage bias (SCUB) and dinucleotide composition in the available complete archaeal virus genome sequences have been investigated. It was found that there is a significant variation in SCUB among differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 101 publications
(110 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, under different conditions, the synonymous codons selected by the amino acids on the protein during translation are not exactly the same, and they prefer to select some specific codons for different species [4]. The selection phenomenon is called codon preference [5][6][7][8]. In this study, all the genes in the genome of Papillomavirus (Type I) from Bos Grunniens and its RSCU screening for the standard, and ultimately find the optimal codon [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, under different conditions, the synonymous codons selected by the amino acids on the protein during translation are not exactly the same, and they prefer to select some specific codons for different species [4]. The selection phenomenon is called codon preference [5][6][7][8]. In this study, all the genes in the genome of Papillomavirus (Type I) from Bos Grunniens and its RSCU screening for the standard, and ultimately find the optimal codon [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%