1977
DOI: 10.1109/tr.1977.5220110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System Availability and Optimum Spare Units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown by Henley and Kumamoto that the conditional probabilities of the FS and FD failures of the alarm subsystem can be written as left P FS AL = Pr false{ f false( boldy false) = 1 | ξ = 0 false} = y f ( y ) Pr false{ y | ξ = 0 false} P FD AL = Pr false{ f false( boldy false) = 0 | ξ = 1 false} = y [ 1 f ( y ) ] Pr false{ y | ξ = 1 false} If the shutdown subsystem is always functional, the expected loss of operating the given process in this situation can be formulated as L AL = C normala Pr { normalξ = 0 } P FS AL + C …”
Section: Total Expected Loss Of Protective Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was shown by Henley and Kumamoto that the conditional probabilities of the FS and FD failures of the alarm subsystem can be written as left P FS AL = Pr false{ f false( boldy false) = 1 | ξ = 0 false} = y f ( y ) Pr false{ y | ξ = 0 false} P FD AL = Pr false{ f false( boldy false) = 0 | ξ = 1 false} = y [ 1 f ( y ) ] Pr false{ y | ξ = 1 false} If the shutdown subsystem is always functional, the expected loss of operating the given process in this situation can be formulated as L AL = C normala Pr { normalξ = 0 } P FS AL + C …”
Section: Total Expected Loss Of Protective Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown by Henley and Kumamoto [13][14][15] that the conditional probabilities of the FS and FD failures of the alarm subsystem can be written as If the shutdown subsystem is always functional, the expected loss of operating the given process in this situation can be formulated as where In eqs 28 and 29, C a and C b denote the financial losses incurred from FS and FD failures, respectively, of the protective system. If the outputs of alarm channels are statistically independent, the conditional probabilities in the above equations (i.e., Pr{y|ξ ) 0} and Pr{y|ξ ) 1}) can be transformed into functions of Α i and Β i , respectively, that is To facilitate comprehensive protective system designs, let us consider all possible failure scenarios (see Figure 8).…”
Section: Total Expected Loss Of Protective Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These probabilities can be related with a set of state equations derived according to the Markov diagram in Figure 1. 6,15,16 For the sake of brevity, the detailed derivations are again omitted and only the resulting formulas are given below:…”
Section: R(t) ) E -λTmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both these algorithms experience intrinsic limitations associated to computational complexity. Sasaki et al [41] developed a method for finding the global optimum between specified upper and lower bounds of the allocation vector for classes of problems where both the objective function and the constraints are monotonically non-decreasing. Several additional methods to find the global optimum are discussed in the Handbook of global optimization edited by Pardalos and Romeijn [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%