“…c difference between the IPCC SRES A2 and a modified SRES B1 scenario where the technology assumes its economic or resource potential; d kWh th are counted as fossil energy only, hydropotential, nuclear energy and ambient energy are excluded; e [3][4][5]; f full life-cycle; g [18]; h [4]; i Figure 2 in [7]; j [12]; k [8]; m 75 g/kWh with enhanced oil recovery, [9]; n base cost + cost for capture, transport, and storage, 0 value indicates net economic benefit in enhanced oil recovery; o [6]; p Table 1 in [10]; q thermal reactors only; r [11]; s [2,14]; t [15], Tabble 2-17; u [16]; v [17]; w [19]; x highly scale-and sitedependent, [20,21]; y [22]; z [23], excludes variability impacts; aa [24]; ab [25]; ac [17], lower values for conceptual plants, higher values for operational plants; ad [26]; ae [27]; af [28], 20 for binary-cycle plants (emissions embodied in the plant); ag [29]; ah [13,30]; ai [5], assumes existing agricultural lands.…”