1996
DOI: 10.1109/12.536240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System dependability evaluation via a fault list generation algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [30], the authors analyze fault/error propagation and data flow diagrams in VHDL-models in order to select a fault list for fault injection which will fully exercise the fault detection and processing aspects of the model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [30], the authors analyze fault/error propagation and data flow diagrams in VHDL-models in order to select a fault list for fault injection which will fully exercise the fault detection and processing aspects of the model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11], a 3-stage random sampling technique is developed; however, a drawback of random selection is the high probability that the injected faults will remain latent, therefore leading to no-response fault insertion experiments. Another selection mechanism reported in [12] is based on fault-list generation. It is an ad hoc technique that depends on the analysis of dataflow and the instruction-set architecture.…”
Section: Fault-insertion Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of programs and tools for efficient fault injection [2,7,10,22,24,26,28,31,35,43,45,49,55,56]. There are efforts to model fault propagation and effect [5,7,12,17,19,22,23,27,28,30,32,36,38,39,40,41,44,45,47,50,52]. Coverage is a popular topic, and the meaning of coverage can vary from simple detection to complete system recovery and reconfiguration [1,2,3,4,5,10,11,12,15,16,17,18,20,21,27,…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%