2017
DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2016.1255217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System Estimation of Panel Data Models Under Long-Range Dependence

Abstract: Projections are carried out based onwhere bold indicates the vector of parameters with the critical parameter values being d max

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our methodology for memory estimation consists in CSS estimation on the first differences of defactored variables, where projections are carried out on the sample means of differenced data, and slope estimation is carried out in the least-squares sense. While our methodology offers a general treatment for stationary and nonstationary indicators and works well in practice as indicated by Monte Carlo experiments, it can nevertheless be extended in the following directions: (a) Different estimation techniques, such as fixed effects and GMM, can be used under our setup as in Robinson and Velasco (2015); (b) The idiosyncratic shocks may be allowed to feature spatial dependence providing further insights in empirical analyses; (c) The independence assumption between the idiosyncratic shocks in the general model can be relaxed to allow for nonfactor endogeneity thereby leading to a cointegrated system analysis in the classical sense as in Ergemen (2015) who considers a less flexible modelization due to the lack of allowance of multiple covariates; (d) Panel unit-root and related hypothesis testing can be readily performed using our methodology, but it could also be interesting to develop tests that can detect breaks in the general model parameters; (e) Homogeneity tests on the slope parameters could be developed by comparing our mean group estimates with pooled estimates derived from a homogeneous version of our model.…”
Section: Final Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our methodology for memory estimation consists in CSS estimation on the first differences of defactored variables, where projections are carried out on the sample means of differenced data, and slope estimation is carried out in the least-squares sense. While our methodology offers a general treatment for stationary and nonstationary indicators and works well in practice as indicated by Monte Carlo experiments, it can nevertheless be extended in the following directions: (a) Different estimation techniques, such as fixed effects and GMM, can be used under our setup as in Robinson and Velasco (2015); (b) The idiosyncratic shocks may be allowed to feature spatial dependence providing further insights in empirical analyses; (c) The independence assumption between the idiosyncratic shocks in the general model can be relaxed to allow for nonfactor endogeneity thereby leading to a cointegrated system analysis in the classical sense as in Ergemen (2015) who considers a less flexible modelization due to the lack of allowance of multiple covariates; (d) Panel unit-root and related hypothesis testing can be readily performed using our methodology, but it could also be interesting to develop tests that can detect breaks in the general model parameters; (e) Homogeneity tests on the slope parameters could be developed by comparing our mean group estimates with pooled estimates derived from a homogeneous version of our model.…”
Section: Final Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panel data models can vary the pricing relationship between hourly trading sessions (this is the so-called slope heterogeneity property) by using regressors that are pertinent to each session (hour-specific regressors). Recent developments in panel data techniques, such as the common correlated effects estimator of Pesaran [30] and its refinements proposed by Ergemen [31] and Thomaidis and Biskas [29], make it possible to consistently estimate price responsiveness to fundamental variates, taking also into account unobserved crosscorrelation, long-range dependance and short-memory dynamics in innovations. Although the focus of interest may be the derivation of empirical fundamental pricing laws, all "secondary" aspects of the system dynamics can adversely affect the above task, often leading to inconsistent estimators for the slope coefficients.…”
Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…} , where f t could be the major source of persistence in data. The model could be complemented with the presence of incidental trends and other exogenous or endogenous observable regressor series, see Ergemen and Velasco (2017) and Ergemen (2017).…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a recent literature on large N, T panel data models with long-range dependence constituting an alternative to AR specifications, see for example Robinson and Velasco (2015), Ergemen and Velasco (2017) and Ergemen (2017). Like models with AR dynamics, these models nest I(1) behaviour, but smoothly and thus the estimates of long-range dependence parameters are asymptotically normal unlike the non-standard asymptotics under non-stationary AR specifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation